首页> 外文期刊>BMC Emergency Medicine >Factors influencing emergency medical readmission risk in a UK district general hospital: A prospective study
【24h】

Factors influencing emergency medical readmission risk in a UK district general hospital: A prospective study

机译:英国地区综合医院紧急医疗再入院风险的影响因素:前瞻性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Over recent years increased emphasis has been given to performance monitoring of NHS hospitals, including overall number of hospital readmissions, which however are often sub-optimally adjusted for case-mix. We therefore conducted a study to examine the effect of various patient and disease factors on the risk of emergency medical readmission. Methods The study setting was a District General Hospital in Greater Manchester and the study period was 4.5-years. All index emergency medical admission during the study period leading to a live discharge were included in the study (n = 20,209). A multivariable proportional hazards modelling was used, based on Hospital Episodes Statistics data, to examine the influence of various baseline factors on readmission risk. Deprivation status was measured with the Townsend deprivation index score. Hazard ratios (HR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) of unplanned emergency medical admission by sex, age group, admission method, diagnostic group, number of coded co-morbidities, length of stay and patient's deprivation status quartile, were calculated. Results Significant independent predictors of readmission risk at 12 months were male sex (HR 1.13, CI: 1.07–1.2), age (age >75 (HR 1.57, CI 1.45–1.7), number of coded co-morbidities (HR for >4 coded co-morbidities: 1.49 CI: 1.26–1.76), admission via GP referral (HR 0.93, CI 0.88–0.99) and primary diagnosis of heart failure (HR 1.33, CI: 1.16–1.53) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma (HR 1.34, CI: 1.21–1.48). Higher level of deprivation was also significantly and independently associated and with increased emergency medical readmission risk at three (HR for the most deprived quartile 1.21, CI: 1.08–1.35), six (HR 1.21, CI: 1.1–1.33) and twelve months (HR 1.25, CI: 1.16–1.36). Conclusions There is a potential for improving health and reducing demand for emergency medical admissions with more effective management of patients with heart failure and chronic obstructive airways disease/asthma. There is also a potential for improving health and reducing demand if reasons for increased readmission risk in more deprived patients are understood. The potential influence of deprivation status on readmission risk should be acknowledged, and NHS performance indicators adjustment for deprivation case-mix would be prudent.
机译:背景技术近年来,人们越来越重视NHS医院的绩效监控,包括医院再入院的总数,但是对于病例组合,常常对其进行次优化。因此,我们进行了一项研究,以检查各种患者和疾病因素对紧急再入院风险的影响。方法研究地点为大曼彻斯特地区总医院,研究时间为4.5年。在研究期间,所有导致生病出院的指数紧急医疗入院均纳入研究(n = 20,209)。基于医院发作统计数据,使用了多变量比例风险模型,以检查各种基线因素对再入院风险的影响。剥夺状态通过Townsend剥夺指数得分进行衡量。计算了按性别,年龄组,入院方法,诊断组,合并症数,住院时间和患者的剥夺状态四分位数计算的计划外急诊入院的危险比(HR)和相关的95%置信区间(CI)。结果在12个月时,再次入院风险的重要独立预测因素是男性(HR 1.13,CI:1.07-1.2),年龄(> 75岁(HR 1.57,CI 1.45-1.7),编码合并症(HR≥4)编码的合并症:1.49 CI:1.26–1.76),通过GP转诊入院(HR 0.93,CI 0.88–0.99)以及心力衰竭的初步诊断(HR 1.33,CI:1.16-1.53​​)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病/哮喘( HR 1.34,CI:1.21–1.48),较高的剥夺水平也显着且独立地与三级(最贫困的四分位数的心率1.21,CI:1.08–1.35),六级(HR 1.21, CI:1.1–1.33)和十二个月(HR 1.25,CI:1.16-1.36)结论结论:通过更有效地管理心力衰竭和慢性阻塞性呼吸道疾病患者,有可能改善健康状况并减少对紧急医疗收治的需求/如果有哮喘的原因,也有改善健康和减少需求的潜力人们了解到更多贫困人群的缓解再入院风险。应认识到剥夺状况对再入院风险的潜在影响,并且应谨慎调整针对剥夺个案组合的NHS绩效指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号