首页> 外文期刊>BMC Palliative Care >Dying among older adults in Switzerland: who dies in hospital, who dies in a nursing home?
【24h】

Dying among older adults in Switzerland: who dies in hospital, who dies in a nursing home?

机译:在瑞士的老年人中死亡:谁死于医院,谁死于养老院?

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Institutional deaths (hospitals and nursing homes) are an important issue because they are often at odds with patient preference and associated with high healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to examine deaths in institutions and the role of individual, regional, and healthcare supply characteristics in explaining variation across Swiss Hospital Service Areas (HSAs). Methods Retrospective study of individuals ≥66?years old who died in a Swiss institution (hospital or nursing homes) in 2010. Using a two-level logistic regression analysis we examined the amount of variation across HSAs adjusting for individual, regional and healthcare supply measures. The outcome was place of death, defined as death in hospital or nursing homes. Results In 2010, 41,275 individuals ≥66?years old died in a Swiss institution; 54?% in nursing homes and 46?% in hospitals. The probability of dying in hospital decreased with increasing age. The OR was 0.07 (95?% CI: 0.05–0.07) for age 91+ years compared to those 66–70 years. Living in peri-urban areas (OR?=?1.06 95?% CI: 1.00–1.11) and French speaking region (OR?=?1.43 95?% CI: 1.22–1.65) was associated with higher probability of hospital death. Females had lower probability of death in hospital (OR?=?0.54 95?% CI: 0.51–0.56). The density of ambulatory care physicians (OR?=?0.81 95?% CI: 0.67–0.97) and nursing homes beds (OR?=?0.67 95?% CI: 0.56–0.79) was negatively associated with hospital death. The proportion of dying in hospital varied from 38?% in HSAs with lowest proportion of hospital deaths to 60?% in HSAs with highest proportion of hospital deaths (1.6-fold variation). Conclusions We found evidence for variation across regions in Switzerland in dying in hospital versus nursing homes, indicating possible overuse and underuse of end of life (EOL) services.
机译:背景机构死亡(医院和疗养院)是一个重要的问题,因为它们常常与患者的偏好相矛盾,并伴随着高昂的医疗费用。这项研究的目的是检查机构中的死亡以及个人,地区和医疗保健供应特征在解释瑞士医院服务区(HSA)差异方面的作用。方法回顾性研究2010年在瑞士一家机构(医院或疗养院)中死亡的≥66岁的个体。使用两级Logistic回归分析,我们研究了根据个人,区域和医疗保健提供的措施进行调整的HSAs的变化量。 。结果是死亡地点,定义为在医院或疗养院死亡。结果2010年,在瑞士的一家机构中,有41,275名≥66岁的人死亡。疗养院为54%,医院为46%。随着年龄的增长,医院死亡的可能性降低。 91岁以上年龄组的OR为0.07(95%CI:0.05-0.07),而66-70岁年龄组为OR。居住在城市周边地区(OR = 1.06,95%CI:1.00–1.11)和法语地区(OR = 1.43,95%CI:1.22-1.65)与医院死亡的可能性更高相关。女性在医院死亡的可能性较低(OR == 0.54 95%CI:0.51-0.56)。卧床护理医师的密度(OR?=?0.81 95%CI:0.67-0.97)和疗养院床位(OR?=?0.67 95%CI:0.56-0.79)与医院死亡呈负相关。医院中的死亡比例从医院死亡比例最低的HSA中的38%到医院死亡比例最高的HSA中的60%(变化1.6倍)。结论我们发现,瑞士医院和疗养院死亡的地区之间存在差异,表明寿命服务(EOL)可能过度使用和使用不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号