...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Palliative Care >Priorities for global research into children’s palliative care: results of an International Delphi Study
【24h】

Priorities for global research into children’s palliative care: results of an International Delphi Study

机译:儿童姑息治疗的全球研究重点:国际德尔菲研究的结果

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background There is an urgent need to develop an evidence base for children’s palliative care (CPC) globally, and in particular in resource-limited settings. Whilst the volume of CPC research has increased in the last decade, it has not been focused on countries where the burden of disease is highest. For example, a review of CPC literature in sub Saharan Africa (SSA) found only five peer-reviewed papers on CPC. This lack of evidence is not confined to SSA, but can be seen globally in specific areas, such as an insufficient research and evidence base on the treatment of pain and other symptoms in children. This need for an evidence base for CPC has been recognised for some time, however without understanding the priorities for research in CPC organisations, many struggle with how to allocate scarce resources to research. Method The International Children’s Palliative Care Network (ICPCN) undertook a Delphi study between October 2012 and February 2013 in order to identify the global research priorities for CPC. Members of the ICPCN Scientific Committee formed a project working group and were asked to suggest areas of research that they considered to be important. The list of 70 areas for research was put through two rounds of the Delphi process via a web-based questionnaire. ICPCN members and affiliated stakeholders (n?=?153 from round 1 and n?=?95 from round 2) completed the survey. Participants from SSA were the second largest group of respondents (28.1?% round 1, 24.2?% round 2) followed by Europe. Results A list of 26 research areas reached consensus. The top five priorities were: Children’s understanding of death and dying; Managing pain in children where there is no morphine; Funding; Training; and Assessment of the WHO two-step analgesic ladder for pain management in children. Conclusions Information from this study is important for policy makers, educators, advocates, funding agencies, and governments. Priorities for research pertinent to CPC throughout the world have been identified. This provides a much needed starting place for the allocation of funds and building research infrastructure. Researchers working in CPC are in a unique position to collaborate and produce the evidence that is needed.
机译:背景技术迫切需要在全球范围内,特别是在资源有限的环境中,为儿童姑息治疗(CPC)建立证据基础。在过去十年中,CPC研究的数量有所增加,但它并没有将重点放在疾病负担最高的国家。例如,对撒哈拉以南非洲(CSA)的CPC文献进行的审查发现,只有五篇关于CPC的同行评审论文。缺乏证据不仅仅限于SSA,而是在特定领域中普遍可见,例如基于治疗儿童疼痛和其他症状的研究和证据不足。对CPC的证据基础的需求已经认识了一段时间,但是在不了解CPC组织研究重点的情况下,许多人都在努力分配稀缺资源来进行研究。方法国际儿童姑息治疗网络(ICPCN)在2012年10月至2013年2月之间进行了一次Delphi研究,以确定CPC的全球研究重点。 ICPCN科学委员会的成员组成了一个项目工作组,并被要求提出他们认为重要的研究领域。通过基于网络的问卷调查,在两轮Delphi流程中列出了70个研究领域。 ICPCN成员和关联利益相关者(第一轮的n?=?153,第二轮的n?=?95)完成了调查。来自SSA的参与者是第二大受访者群体(第一轮占28.1%,第二轮占24.2%),其次是欧洲。结果共有26个研究领域的清单达成了共识。最重要的五个优先事项是:儿童对死亡和死亡的理解;在没有吗啡的儿童中处理疼痛;资金;训练;世界卫生组织两步镇痛阶梯治疗儿童疼痛的评估。结论结论来自本研究的信息对于政策制定者,教育者,倡导者,资助机构和政府而言非常重要。已经确定了全世界与CPC相关的研究重点。这为分配资金和建立研究基础设施提供了急需的起点。在CPC中工作的研究人员处于独特的位置,可以进行协作并提供所需的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号