首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making >The value of structured data elements from electronic health records for identifying subjects for primary care clinical trials
【24h】

The value of structured data elements from electronic health records for identifying subjects for primary care clinical trials

机译:电子健康记录中的结构化数据元素对于识别初级保健临床试验受试者的价值

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

An increasing number of clinical trials are conducted in primary care settings. Making better use of existing data in the electronic health records to identify eligible subjects can improve efficiency of such studies. Our study aims to quantify the proportion of eligibility criteria that can be addressed with data in electronic health records and to compare the content of eligibility criteria in primary care with previous work. Eligibility criteria were extracted from primary care studies downloaded from the UK Clinical Research Network Study Portfolio. Criteria were broken into elemental statements. Two expert independent raters classified each statement based on whether or not structured data items in the electronic health record can be used to determine if the statement was true for a specific patient. Disagreements in classification were discussed until 100?% agreement was reached. Statements were also classified based on content and the percentages of each category were compared to two similar studies reported in the literature. Eligibility criteria were retrieved from 228 studies and decomposed into 2619 criteria elemental statements. 74?% of the criteria elemental statements were considered likely associated with structured data in an electronic health record. 79?% of the studies had at least 60?% of their criteria statements addressable with structured data likely to be present in an electronic health record. Based on clinical content, most frequent categories were: “disease, symptom, and sign”, “therapy or surgery”, and “medication” (36?%, 13?%, and 10?% of total criteria statements respectively). We also identified new criteria categories related to provider and caregiver attributes (2.6?% and 1?% of total criteria statements respectively). Electronic health records readily contain much of the data needed to assess patients’ eligibility for clinical trials enrollment. Eligibility criteria content categories identified by our study can be incorporated as data elements in electronic health records to facilitate their integration with clinical trial management systems.
机译:在基层医疗机构中进行的临床试验越来越多。更好地利用电子健康记录中的现有数据来确定合格的受试者可以提高此类研究的效率。我们的研究旨在量化可通过电子健康记录中的数据解决的合格标准的比例,并将初级保健中的合格标准的内容与以前的工作进行比较。资格标准摘自从英国临床研究网络研究组合下载的初级保健研究。标准被分解为基本陈述。两名独立的专家评估员根据电子健康记录中的结构化数据项是否可以用于确定特定患者的陈述是否正确来对每个陈述进行分类。讨论了分类上的分歧,直到达成100%一致。还根据内容对陈述进行分类,并将每个类别的百分比与文献中报道的两项类似研究进行比较。从228项研究中检索了资格标准,并将其分解为2619条标准元素陈述。认为标准陈述中74%的内容可能与电子健康记录中的结构化数据相关。 79%的研究中至少有60 %%的标准声明可通过电子健康记录中可能存在的结构化数据解决。根据临床内容,最常见的类别是:“疾病,症状和体征”,“治疗或手术”和“药物治疗”(分别占总标准陈述的36%,13%和10%)。我们还确定了与提供者和照顾者属性相关的新准则类别(分别占准则总数的2.6%和1%)。电子健康记录很容易包含评估患者是否有资格参加临床试验所需的许多数据。通过我们的研究确定的资格标准内容类别可以作为电子健康记录中的数据元素并入,以促进其与临床试验管理系统的集成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号