首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making >Measuring the operational impact of digitized hospital records: a mixed methods study
【24h】

Measuring the operational impact of digitized hospital records: a mixed methods study

机译:衡量数字化医院记录的运营影响:混合方法研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Digitized (scanned) medical records have been seen as a means for hospitals to reduce costs and improve access to records. However, clinical usability of digitized records can potentially have negative effects on productivity. Methods Data were collected during follow-up outpatient consultations in two NHS hospitals by non-clinical observers using a work sampling approach in which pre-defined categories of clinician time usage were specified. Quantitative data was analysed using two-way ANOVA models and the Mann-Whitney U test. A focus group was held with clinicians to qualitatively explore their experiences using digitized medical records. The quantitative and qualitative results were synthesized. Results Four hundred six consultations were observed. Using paper records, there was a significant difference in consultation times between hospitals ( p =?0.016) and a significant difference in consultation times between specialties within hospitals ( p =?0.003). Using digitized records there was a significant difference in consultation times between specialties within a hospital ( p =?0.001). Excluding outliers, there was no significant difference between consultation times using digitized records compared with consultations using paper records in the same hospital, either at site ( p >?=0.285) or specialty level ( p >?=0.122). With digitized records at site A, two out of three specialties showed a significant increase in time spent searching computer records ( p Conclusions Digitized medical records can be implemented without detrimental operational impact. Inherent differences between specialties can outweigh the differences between paper and digitized records. Clear and consistent operational processes are vital for the reliability and usability of digitized medical records. Divergent views about usability (such as whether patient summary information is better or worse) may reflect familiarity with features of the digitized record.
机译:背景技术数字化(扫描的)医疗记录已被视为医院降低成本和改善对记录的访问的一种手段。但是,数字化记录的临床可用性可能会对生产率产生负面影响。方法:非临床观察员在NHS两家医院的门诊随访期间收集数据,采用工作抽样方法,其中规定了预定义的临床医生使用时间类别。使用双向ANOVA模型和Mann-Whitney U检验分析定量数据。与临床医生举行了一个焦点小组,以使用数字化医疗记录定性地探索他们的经历。综合了定性和定量结果。结果观察到406次咨询。使用纸质记录,医院之间的咨询时间存在显着差异(p = 0.016),而医院内各专业之间的咨询时间也存在显着差异(p = 0.003)。使用数字化记录,医院内各专科之间的咨询时间存在显着差异(p =?0.001)。除异常值外,在同一家医院(p>?= 0.285)或专业水平(p>?= 0.122),使用数字化记录进行咨询的时间与使用纸质记录进行咨询的时间之间没有显着差异。使用地点A的数字化记录后,三个专业中有两个显示出花费在搜索计算机记录上的时间显着增加(p结论可以实施数字化医疗记录而不会产生不利的操作影响。专业之间的内在差异可能会超过纸张和数字化记录之间的差异。清晰一致的操作流程对于数字化医疗记录的可靠性和可用性至关重要,关于可用性的不同观点(例如,患者摘要信息的好坏)可能反映出对数字化记录功能的熟悉程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号