首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cardiovascular Disorders >Post percutaneous coronary interventional adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events observed with prasugrel versus clopidogrel: direct comparison through a meta-analysis
【24h】

Post percutaneous coronary interventional adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events observed with prasugrel versus clopidogrel: direct comparison through a meta-analysis

机译:普拉格雷与氯吡格雷观察到的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后不良心血管结果和出血事件:通过荟萃分析直接比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Due to limitations associated with clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), other newer oral anti-platelet agents are being studied. We aimed to systematically carry out a direct comparison of outcomes observed with prasugrel versus clopidogrel following PCI. Common online searched databases (The Cochrane library, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Google scholar) were used to retrieve relevant publications. Primary endpoints were the adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Secondary outcomes were the bleeding events. This analysis was carried out by RevMan 5.3, whereby odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were considered as the statistical parameters. Eight studies with a total number of 18,122 participants were included in this direct analysis. Prasugrel was associated with significantly lower adverse cardiovascular outcomes in comparison to clopidogrel following PCI. All-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiac events were all significantly lower with prasugrel (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.35–0.63; P?=?0.0001), (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.57–0.80; P?=?0.00001), (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38–0.96; P?=?0.03), (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.30–0.72; P?=?0.0006) and (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.53–0.70; P?=?0.00001) respectively. When the bleeding outcomes were analyzed, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) defined major and minor bleeding were not significantly different (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.66–1.27; P?=?0.59) and (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.85–1.59; P?=?0.35) respectively. However, the combined ‘all bleeding events’ was significantly higher with prasugrel (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.03–1.70; P?=?0.03), but when patients with STEMI and those undergoing elective PCI were separately analyzed, no significant difference in overall bleeding was observed. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes were significantly lower with the use of prasugrel in comparison to clopidogrel following PCI. In addition, TIMI defined major and minor bleeding were not significantly different showing prasugrel to be well-tolerated following PCI especially in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
机译:由于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后与氯吡格雷相关的局限性,正在研究其他新型口服抗血小板药。我们旨在系统地进行PCI后普拉格雷与氯吡格雷观察到的结果的直接比较。常用的在线搜索数据库(Cochrane库,EMBASE,MEDLINE和Google Scholar)用于检索相关出版物。主要终点是不良心血管结果。次要结果是出血事件。该分析是通过RevMan 5.3进行的,其中将优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)视为统计参数。直接分析包括八项研究,共有18,122名参与者。与PCI后的氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷与心血管不良反应的发生率显着降低。普拉格雷组的全因死亡率,心肌梗塞,中风,支架血栓形成和主要不良心脏事件均显着降低(OR:0.47,95%CI:0.35-0.63; P?=?0.0001),(OR:0.68,95% CI:0.57–0.80; P <= 0.00001),(或:0.60,95%CI:0.38-0.96; P <= 0.03),(OR:0.46,95%CI:0.30–0.72; P <=? 0.0006)和(OR:0.61,95%CI:0.53-0.70; P?=?0.00001)。当分析出血结果时,心肌梗塞溶栓(TIMI)定义的大出血和小出血没有显着差异(OR:0.91,95%CI:0.66-1.27; P?=?0.59)和(OR:1.16,95% CI:0.85-1.59;P≤0.35)。然而,普拉格雷治疗组的“所有出血事件”合并发生率显着更高(OR:1.32,95%CI:1.03-1.70; P = 0.03),但是当分别分析STEMI患者和择期PCI患者时,无统计学意义。观察到总体出血的差异。与PCI后使用氯吡格雷相比,使用普拉格雷治疗的不良心血管后果显着降低。此外,TIMI定义的大出血和小出血无明显差异,显示普拉格雷在PCI后耐受良好,特别是在急性冠脉综合征患者中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号