首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cardiovascular Disorders >Effectiveness of two intensive treatment methods for smoking cessation and relapse prevention in patients with coronary heart disease: study protocol and baseline description
【24h】

Effectiveness of two intensive treatment methods for smoking cessation and relapse prevention in patients with coronary heart disease: study protocol and baseline description

机译:两种强化治疗方法对冠心病患者戒烟和预防复发的有效性:研究方案和基线描述

获取原文
           

摘要

Background There is no more effective intervention for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease than smoking cessation. Yet, evidence about the (cost-)effectiveness of smoking cessation treatment methods for cardiac inpatients that also suit nursing practice is scarce. This protocol describes the design of a study on the (cost-)effectiveness of two intensive smoking cessation interventions for hospitalised cardiac patients as well as first results on the inclusion rates and the characteristics of the study population. Methods/design An experimental study design is used in eight cardiac wards of hospitals throughout the Netherlands to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of two intensive smoking cessation counselling methods both combined with nicotine replacement therapy. Randomization is conducted at the ward level (cross-over). Baseline and follow-up measurements after six and 12 months are obtained. Upon admission to the cardiac ward, nurses assess patients’ smoking behaviour, ensure a quit advice and subsequently refer patients for either telephone counselling or face-to-face counselling. The counselling interventions have a comparable structure and content but differ in provider and delivery method, and in duration. Both counselling interventions are compared with a control group receiving no additional treatment beyond the usual care. Between December 2009 and June 2011, 245 cardiac patients who smoked prior to hospitalisation were included in the usual care group, 223 in the telephone counselling group and 157 in the face-to-face counselling group. Patients are predominantly male and have a mean age of 57?years. Acute coronary syndrome is the most frequently reported admission diagnosis. The ultimate goal of the study is to assess the effects of the interventions on smoking abstinence and their cost-effectiveness. Telephone counselling is expected to be more (cost-)effective in highly motivated patients and patients with high SES, whereas face-to-face counselling is expected to be more (cost-)effective in less motivated patients and patients with low SES. Discussion This study examines two intensive smoking cessation interventions for cardiac patients using a multi-centre trial with eight cardiac wards. Although not all eligible patients could be included and the distribution of patients is skewed in the different groups, the results will be able to provide valuable insight into effects and costs of counselling interventions varying in delivery mode and intensity, also concerning subgroups. Trial registration Dutch Trial Register NTR2144
机译:背景技术没有比戒烟更有效的干预措施来预防冠心病。然而,关于适合心脏病患者的戒烟治疗方法在成本(成本)效益方面也缺乏证据,这也适合护理实践。该协议描述了针对住院心脏病患者的两种强化戒烟干预措施(成本)效果的研究设计,以及纳入率和研究人群特征的初步结果。方法/设计在荷兰的八家医院的心脏病房中使用了一项实验研究设计,以评估两种密集戒烟咨询方法与尼古丁替代疗法相结合的(成本)效果。随机分组在病房一级进行(交叉)。在六个月和十二个月后获得基线和随访测量值。进入心脏病房后,护士会评估患者的吸烟行为,确保戒烟建议,然后转介患者进行电话咨询或面对面咨询。咨询干预措施具有可比的结构和内容,但提供者和交付方式以及持续时间有所不同。将这两种咨询干预措施与对照组进行比较,而对照组仅接受常规护理。在2009年12月至2011年6月之间,常规护理组包括245名在住院前吸烟的心脏病患者,电话咨询组为223名,面对面咨询组为157名。患者主要是男性,平均年龄为57岁。急性冠状动脉综合征是最常报告的入院诊断。该研究的最终目标是评估干预措施对戒烟的效果及其成本效益。在积极性高的患者和SES较高的患者中,电话咨询预计将更具成本效益,而在积极性较低的患者和SES较低的患者中,面对面咨询则更具成本效益。讨论本研究使用8个心脏病房的多中心试验,研究了针对心脏病患者的两种强化戒烟干预措施。尽管不是所有合格的患者都可以包括在内,并且患者的分布在不同的组中有所偏斜,但结果将能够提供宝贵的见解,以了解在分娩方式和强度方面也与亚组有关的咨询干预措施的效果和成本。试用注册荷兰试用注册NTR2144

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号