首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Intraoperative detection of 18 F-FDG-avid tissue sites using the increased probe counting efficiency of the K-alpha probe design and variance-based statistical analysis with the three-sigma criteria
【24h】

Intraoperative detection of 18 F-FDG-avid tissue sites using the increased probe counting efficiency of the K-alpha probe design and variance-based statistical analysis with the three-sigma criteria

机译:使用增加的K-alpha探针设计的探针计数效率和基于三西格玛标准的基于方差的统计分析,术中检测18个F-FDG-avid组织部位

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Intraoperative detection of 18F-FDG-avid tissue sites during 18F-FDG-directed surgery can be very challenging when utilizing gamma detection probes that rely on a fixed target-to-background (T/B) ratio (ratiometric threshold) for determination of probe positivity. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the counting efficiency and the success rate of in situ intraoperative detection of 18F-FDG-avid tissue sites (using the three-sigma statistical threshold criteria method and the ratiometric threshold criteria method) for three different gamma detection probe systems. Methods Of 58 patients undergoing 18F-FDG-directed surgery for known or suspected malignancy using gamma detection probes, we identified nine 18F-FDG-avid tissue sites (from amongst seven patients) that were seen on same-day preoperative diagnostic PET/CT imaging, and for which each 18F-FDG-avid tissue site underwent attempted in situ intraoperative detection concurrently using three gamma detection probe systems (K-alpha probe, and two commercially-available PET-probe systems), and then were subsequently surgical excised. Results The mean relative probe counting efficiency ratio was 6.9 (± 4.4, range 2.2–15.4) for the K-alpha probe, as compared to 1.5 (± 0.3, range 1.0–2.1) and 1.0 (± 0, range 1.0–1.0), respectively, for two commercially-available PET-probe systems (P?18F-FDG-avid tissue sites was more frequently accomplished with each of the three gamma detection probes tested by using the three-sigma statistical threshold criteria method than by using the ratiometric threshold criteria method, specifically with the three-sigma statistical threshold criteria method being significantly better than the ratiometric threshold criteria method for determining probe positivity for the K-alpha probe (P?=?0.05). Conclusions Our results suggest that the improved probe counting efficiency of the K-alpha probe design used in conjunction with the three-sigma statistical threshold criteria method can allow for improved detection of 18F-FDG-avid tissue sites when a low in situ T/B ratio is encountered.
机译:背景技术当使用依赖于固定靶标的伽玛检测探针时,在 18 F-FDG指导的手术过程中对 18 F-FDG-avid组织部位的术中检测可能非常具有挑战性。与背景(T / B)的比率(比率阈值),用于确定探针的阳性。本研究的目的是评估使用三西格玛统计阈值标准方法和比例阈值对 18 F-FDG-avid组织部位进行术中原位检测的计数效率和成功率标准方法)用于三种不同的伽马探测探针系统。方法使用伽玛探测探针对58例因已知或疑似恶性肿瘤进行 18 F-FDG手术的患者,我们从9个 18 F-FDG-avid组织部位中识别出9个7名患者)在术前当天进行了PET / CT诊断成像,并针对每个 18 F-FDG-avid组织部位均尝试同时使用三种伽马探测探针系统进行术中原位检测( K-alpha探针和两个市售的PET探针系统),然后进行手术切除。结果K-alpha探针的平均相对探针计数效率比为6.9(±4.4,范围2.2-15.4),而1.5(±0.3,范围1.0-2.1)和1.0(±0,范围1.0-1.0)分别,使用三西格玛统计阈值标准方法测试的三种伽马探测探针中的每一种,分别更频繁地完成了两个市售的PET探针系统(P?18 F-FDG-avid组织部位的检测)比使用比例阈值标准方法,特别是三西格玛统计阈值标准方法明显优于确定K-alpha探针的探针阳性率的比例阈值标准方法(P?=?0.05)。 K-alpha探针设计与三西格玛统计阈值标准方法结合使用时提高的探针计数效率可以改善在低剂量时 18 F-FDG-avid组织部位的检测遇到原位T / B比d。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号