...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >SmartArc-based volumetric modulated arc therapy for endometrial cancer: a dosimetric comparison with helical tomotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy
【24h】

SmartArc-based volumetric modulated arc therapy for endometrial cancer: a dosimetric comparison with helical tomotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy

机译:基于SmartArc的子宫内膜癌体积调制电弧疗法:与螺旋体层放射疗法和强度调制放射疗法的剂量学比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background The purpose of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of using volumetric modulated arc therapy with SmartArc (VMAT-S) to achieve radiation delivery efficiency higher than that of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and helical tomotherapy (HT) when treating endometrial cancer, while maintaining plan quality. Methods Nine patients with endometrial cancer were retrospectively studied. Three plans per patient were generated for VMAT-S, IMRT and HT. The dose distributions for the planning target volume (PTV), organs at risk (OARs) and normal tissue were compared. The monitor units (MUs) and treatment delivery time were also evaluated. Results The average homogeneity index was 1.06, 1.10 and 1.07 for the VMAT-S, IMRT and HT plans, respectively. The V40 for the rectum, bladder and pelvis bone decreased by 9.0%, 3.0% and 3.0%, respectively, in the VMAT-S plan relative to the IMRT plan. The target coverage and sparing of OARs were comparable between the VMAT-S and HT plans. The average MU was 823, 1105 and 8403 for VMAT-S, IMRT and HT, respectively; the average delivery time was 2.6, 8.6 and 9.5?minutes, respectively. Conclusions For endometrial cancer, the VMAT-S plan provided comparable quality with significantly shorter delivery time and fewer MUs than with the IMRT and HT plans. In addition, more homogeneous PTV coverage and superior sparing of OARs in the medium to high dose region were observed in the VMAT-S relative to the IMRT plan.
机译:背景技术本研究的目的是研究在治疗子宫内膜时采用容积弧调制疗法与SmartArc(VMAT-S)来实现比强度调制放射疗法(IMRT)和螺旋体层放射疗法(HT)更高的放射传递效率的可行性。癌症,同时保持计划质量。方法对9例子宫内膜癌患者进行回顾性研究。每位患者针对VMAT-S,IMRT和HT制定了三个计划。比较了计划目标体积(PTV),高危器官(OARs)和正常组织的剂量分布。还评估了监护仪单元(MU)和治疗时间。结果VMAT-S,IMRT和HT计划的平均同质性指数分别为1.06、1.10和1.07。相对于IMRT计划,VMAT-S计划的直肠,膀胱和骨盆的V 40 分别降低了9.0%,3.0%和3.0%。在VMAT-S和HT计划之间,OAR的目标覆盖范围和备用量相当。 VMAT-S,IMRT和HT的平均MU分别为823、1105和8403;平均交货时间分别为2.6、8.6和9.5分钟。结论对于子宫内膜癌,与IMRT和HT计划相比,VMAT-S计划可提供可比的质量,交货时间明显缩短,MU更少。此外,相对于IMRT计划,在VMAT-S中观察到了中到高剂量区域中更均匀的PTV覆盖和OAR的出色保留。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号