首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >LPA, HGF, and EGF utilize distinct combinations of signaling pathways to promote migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells
【24h】

LPA, HGF, and EGF utilize distinct combinations of signaling pathways to promote migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells

机译:LPA,HGF和EGF利用信号通路的不同组合来促进MDA-MB-231乳腺癌细胞的迁移和侵袭

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Various pathways impinge on the actin-myosin pathway to facilitate cell migration and invasion including members of the Rho family of small GTPases and MAPK. However, the signaling components that are considered important for these processes vary substantially within the literature with certain pathways being favored. These distinctions in signaling pathways utilized are often attributed to differences in cell type or physiological conditions; however, these attributes have not been systematically assessed. Methods To address this question, we analyzed the migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cell line in response to various stimuli including lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) and determined the involvement of select signaling pathways that impact myosin light chain phosphorylation. Results LPA, a potent stimulator of the Rho-ROCK pathway, surprisingly did not require the Rho-ROCK pathway to stimulate migration but instead utilized Rac and MAPK. In contrast, LPA-stimulated invasion required Rho, Rac, and MAPK. Of these three major pathways, EGF-stimulated MDA-MB-231 migration and invasion required Rho; however, Rac was essential only for invasion and MAPK was dispensable for migration. HGF signaling, interestingly, utilized the same pathways for migration and invasion, requiring Rho but not Rac signaling. Notably, the dependency of HGF-stimulated migration and invasion as well as EGF-stimulated invasion on MAPK was subject to the inhibitors used. As expected, myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), a convergence point for MAPK and Rho family GTPase signaling, was required for all six conditions. Conclusions These observations suggest that, while multiple signaling pathways contribute to cancer cell motility, not all pathways operate under all conditions. Thus, our study highlights the plasticity of cancer cells to adapt to multiple migratory cues.
机译:背景技术各种途径撞击肌动蛋白-肌球蛋白途径以促进细胞迁移和侵袭,包括小GTPases和MAPK的Rho家族成员。但是,在这些文献中被认为对这些过程很重要的信号传导成分在很大程度上有所不同,其中某些途径受到了支持。所利用的信号传导途径的这些差异通常归因于细胞类型或生理状况的差异。但是,这些属性尚未得到系统评估。方法为了解决这个问题,我们分析了MDA-MB-231乳腺癌细胞系对溶血磷脂酸(LPA),肝细胞生长因子(HGF)和表皮生长因子(EGF)各种刺激的迁移和侵袭,并确定了影响肌球蛋白轻链磷酸化的选择性信号通路的参与。结果LPA是Rho-ROCK途径的有效刺激剂,令人惊讶地不需要Rho-ROCK途径来刺激迁移,而是利用Rac和MAPK。相反,LPA刺激的入侵需要Rho,Rac和MAPK。在这三个主要途径中,EGF刺激的MDA-MB-231迁移和侵袭需要Rho。但是,Rac仅对于入侵至关重要,而MAPK对于迁移是必不可少的。有趣的是,HGF信号传导利用相同的途径进行迁移和入侵,需要Rho而不是Rac信号传导。值得注意的是,HGF刺激的迁移和侵袭以及EGF刺激的侵袭对MAPK的依赖性取决于所使用的抑制剂。如预期的那样,所有六个条件都需要肌球蛋白轻链激酶(MLCK)(MAPK和Rho家族GTPase信号转导的收敛点)。结论这些观察结果表明,尽管多种信号通路可促进癌细胞的运动,但并非所有通路都在所有条件下都起作用。因此,我们的研究强调了癌细胞可塑性,以适应多种迁徙线索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号