...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by tumor characteristics: a case-control study
【24h】

Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by tumor characteristics: a case-control study

机译:乳腺钼靶X线照相术密度和根据肿瘤特征的乳腺癌风险:病例对照研究

获取原文

摘要

In a previous paper, we had assumed that the risk of screen-detected breast cancer mostly reflects inherent risk, and the risk of whether a breast cancer is interval versus screen-detected mostly reflects risk of masking. We found that inherent risk was predicted by body mass index (BMI) and dense area (DA) or percent dense area (PDA), but not by non-dense area (NDA). Masking, however, was best predicted by PDA but not BMI. In this study, we aimed to investigate if these associations vary by tumor characteristics and mode of detection. We conducted a case-control study nested within the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study of 244 screen-detected cases matched to 700 controls and 148 interval cases matched to 446 controls. DA, NDA and PDA were measured using the Cumulus software. Tumor characteristics included size, grade, lymph node involvement, and ER, PR, and HER2 status. Conditional and unconditional logistic regression were applied as appropriate to estimate the Odds per Adjusted Standard Deviation (OPERA) adjusted for age and BMI, allowing the association with BMI to be a function of age at diagnosis. For screen-detected cancer, both DA and PDA were associated to an increased risk of tumors of large size (OPERA?~?1.6) and positive lymph node involvement (OPERA?~?1.8); no association was observed for BMI and NDA. For risk of interval versus screen-detected breast cancer, the association with risk for any of the three mammographic measures did not vary by tumor characteristics; an association was observed for BMI for positive lymph nodes (OPERA?~?0.6). No associations were observed for tumor grade and ER, PR and HER2 status of tumor. Both DA and PDA were predictors of inherent risk of larger breast tumors and positive nodal status, whereas for each of the three mammographic density measures the association with risk of masking did not vary by tumor characteristics. This might raise the hypothesis that the risk of breast tumours with poorer prognosis, such as larger and node positive tumours, is intrinsically associated with increased mammographic density and not through delay of diagnosis due to masking.
机译:在先前的论文中,我们曾假设筛查乳腺癌的风险主要反映出内在风险,而乳腺癌是间隔筛查还是筛查乳腺癌的风险主要反映了掩盖风险。我们发现,固有风险是通过体重指数(BMI)和密集区域(DA)或密集区域百分比(PDA)预测的,而不是通过非密集区域(NDA)预测的。但是,最好用PDA而不是BMI预测掩蔽。在这项研究中,我们旨在研究这些关联是否因肿瘤特征和检测方式而异。我们进行了一项“病例对照研究”,该研究嵌套在“墨尔本合作队列研究”中,涉及244例筛查到的病例与700例对照相匹配,以及148例间隔病例与446例对照相匹配。使用Cumulus软件测量DA,NDA和PDA。肿瘤特征包括大小,等级,淋巴结受累以及ER,PR和HER2状态。适当地应用条件和无条件逻辑回归来估计针对年龄和BMI进行调整的每个调整后标准差(OPERA)的几率,从而使与BMI的关联成为诊断时年龄的函数。对于经筛查的癌症,DA和PDA均与大尺寸肿瘤(OPERA≥1.6)和阳性淋巴结受累(OPERA≥1.8)的风险增加有关。没有观察到BMI和NDA的关联。对于间隔性和筛查性乳腺癌的风险,三种乳腺X线检查方法中任何一种的风险关联因肿瘤特征而异。观察到BMI与阳性淋巴结相关(OPERA≥0.6)。没有观察到与肿瘤等级和肿瘤的ER,PR和HER2状态相关。 DA和PDA都是较大乳腺肿瘤和淋巴结阳性的内在风险的预测因子,而对于三种乳腺X线密度测量,每种掩蔽风险的相关性均不会因肿瘤特征而异。这可能会提出这样的假设,即预后较差的乳腺肿瘤(例如较大的淋巴结阳性肿瘤)的风险与乳腺X线摄影密度增加有内在联系,而不是由于掩盖而延迟诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号