首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Retrospective and comparative analysis of 99m Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women
【24h】

Retrospective and comparative analysis of 99m Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women

机译:99m Tc-Sestamibi乳腺特异性γ成像与钼靶,超声和磁共振成像的回顾性比较分析,以检测中国女性乳腺癌

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Diagnosing breast cancer during the early stage may be helpful for decreasing cancer-related mortality. In Western developed countries, mammographies have been the gold standard for breast cancer detection. However, Chinese women usually have denser and smaller-sized breasts compared to Caucasian women, which decreases the diagnostic accuracy of mammography. However, breast specific gamma imaging, a type of molecular functional breast imaging, has been used for the accurate diagnosis of breast cancer and is not influenced by breast density. Our objective was to analyze the breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI) diagnostic value for Chinese women. Methods During a 2-year period, 357 women were diagnosed and treated at our oncology department and received BSGI in addition to mammography (MMG), ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnostic assessment. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of each method of detection and compared the biological profiles of the four imaging methods. Results A total of 357 women received a final surgical pathology diagnosis, with 168 malignant diseases (58.5?%) and 119 benign diseases (41.5?%). Of these, 166 underwent the four imaging tests preoperatively. The sensitivity of BSGI was 80.35 and 82.14?% by US, 75.6?% by MMG, and 94.06?% by MRI. Furthermore, the breast cancer diagnosis specificity of BSGI was high (83.19?% vs. 77.31?% vs. 66.39?% vs. 67.69?%, respectively). The BSGI diagnostic sensitivity for mammographic breast density in women was superior to mammography and more sensitive for non-luminal A subtypes (luminal A vs. non-luminal A, 68.63?% vs. 88.30?%). Conclusions BSGI may help improve the ability to diagnose early stage breast cancer for Chinese women, particularly for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), mammographic breast density and non-luminal A breast cancer.
机译:背景技术早期诊断乳腺癌可能有助于降低与癌症相关的死亡率。在西方发达国家,乳腺钼靶检查已成为检测乳腺癌的金标准。但是,与白人女性相比,中国女性的乳房通常更密集,更小,这降低了乳房X线照片的诊断准确性。但是,乳房特异性伽马成像(一种分子功能性乳房成像)已被用于乳腺癌的准确诊断,并且不受乳房密度的影响。我们的目标是分析乳腺特异性伽马成像(BSGI)对中国女性的诊断价值。方法在2年的时间里,我们的肿瘤科对357名妇女进行了诊断和治疗,并接受了X线检查(MMG),超声(US)和磁共振成像(MRI)进行BSGI诊断诊断。我们调查了每种检测方法的敏感性和特异性,并比较了四种成像方法的生物学特性。结果共有357名妇女接受了最终的手术病理诊断,其中包括168例恶性疾病(占58.5%)和119例良性疾病(占41.5%)。其中166例术前接受了4次成像检查。美国的BSGI敏感性分别为80.35和82.14%,MMG的敏感性为75.6%,MRI的敏感性为94.06%。此外,BSGI的乳腺癌诊断特异性很高(分别为83.19%和77.31%,66.39%和67.69%)。 BSGI对女性乳房X线照片的诊断敏感性优于乳房X线照片,对非管腔A亚型的敏感性更高(管腔A与非管腔A的类型分别为68.63%和88.30%)。结论BSGI可能有助于提高中国女性早期乳腺癌的诊断能力,尤其是导管原位癌(DCIS),乳腺钼靶X线密度和非管腔A型乳腺癌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号