...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Assessment and model guided cancer screening promotion by village doctors in China: a randomized controlled trial protocol
【24h】

Assessment and model guided cancer screening promotion by village doctors in China: a randomized controlled trial protocol

机译:中国乡村医生对癌症筛查的评估和模型指导推广:随机对照试验方案

获取原文

摘要

Background Proven cost-effectiveness contrasted by low uptake of cancer screening (CS) calls for new methodologies promoting the service. Contemporary interventions in this regard relies primarily on strategies targeting general or specific groups with limited attention being paid to individualized approaches. This trial tests a novel package promoting CS utilization via continuous and tailored counseling delivered by primary caregivers. It aims at demonstrating that high risk individuals in the intervention arm will, compared to those in the delayed intervention condition, show increased use of CS service. Methods/Design The trial adopts a quasi-randomized controlled trial design and involves 2160 high risk individuals selected, via rapid and detailed risk assessments, from about 72,000 farmers aged 35+ in 36 administrative villages randomized into equal intervention and delayed intervention arms. The CS intervention package uses: a) village doctors and village clinics to deliver personalized and thus relatively sophisticated CS counseling; b) two-stage risk assessment models in identifying high risk individuals to focus the intervention on the most needed; c) standardized operation procedures to guide conduct of counseling; d) real-time effectiveness and quality monitoring to leverage continuous improvement; e) web-based electronic system to enable prioritizing complex determinants of CS uptake and tailoring counseling sessions to the changing needs of individual farmers. The intervention arm receives baseline and semiannual follow up evaluations plus CS counseling for 5?years; while the delayed intervention arm, only the same baseline and follow-up evaluations for the first 5?years and CS counseling starting from the 6th year if the intervention proved effective. Evaluation measures include: CS uptake by high risk farmers and changes in their knowledge, perceptions and self-efficacy about CS. Discussion Given the complexity and heterogeneity in the determinant system of individual CS service seeking behavior, personalized interventions may prove to be an effective strategy. The current trial distinguishes itself from previous ones in that it not only adopts a personalized strategy but also introduces a package of pragmatic solutions based on proven theories for tackling potential barriers and incorporating key success factors in a synergetic way toward low cost, effective and sustainable CS promotion. Trial registration ISRCTN33269053
机译:背景事实证明,与癌症筛查(CS)摄取率低形成鲜明对比的成本效益要求采用新方法来推广该服务。在这方面,当代干预主要依靠针对一般或特定群体的战略,而对个体化方法的关注却很少。该试验通过主要护理人员提供的持续且量身定制的咨询服务,测试了一种新颖的软件包,可促进CS使用。它旨在证明与延迟干预条件下的那些人相比,干预部门中的高风险个人将显示更多使用CS服务。方法/设计该试验采用准随机对照试验设计,通过快速和详细的风险评估,从2个160个高风险个体中选出了36个行政村的72,000名35岁以上的农民,他们随机分为平等干预和延迟干预组。 CS干预工具包使用:a)乡村医生和乡村诊所提供个性化的,因此相对复杂的CS咨询; b)两阶段风险评估模型,用于识别高风险个人,使干预措施集中在最需要的人群上; c)标准化的操作程序,以指导咨询工作; d)实时有效性和质量监控以利用持续改进; e)基于网络的电子系统,可以优先考虑CS吸收的复杂决定因素,并根据个体农民的变化需求量身定制咨询会议。干预部门接受基线和半年随访评估以及CS咨询5年;而延迟干预组,如果干预被证明是有效的,则前5年仅需进行相同的基线和随访评估,并从第6年开始进行CS咨询。评估措施包括:高风险农民吸收CS以及他们对CS的知识,看法和自我效能的变化。讨论鉴于个人CS服务寻求行为的决定因素系统中的复杂性和异质性,个性化干预可能被证明是一种有效的策略。本试验与以前的试验的不同之处在于,它不仅采用了个性化策略,而且还引入了一套基于可靠理论的务实解决方案,以解决潜在障碍并以协同方式整合关键成功因素,从而实现了低成本,有效和可持续的CS晋升。试用注册ISRCTN33269053

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号