...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Central nervous system progression in advanced non–small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations in response to first-line treatment with two EGFR-TKIs, gefitinib and erlotinib: a comparative study
【24h】

Central nervous system progression in advanced non–small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations in response to first-line treatment with two EGFR-TKIs, gefitinib and erlotinib: a comparative study

机译:吉非替尼和厄洛替尼两种EGFR-TKI的一线治疗对EGFR突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的中枢神经系统进展进行了比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Central nervous system (CNS) brain metastasis of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients confers a worse quality of life and prognosis. The efficacy comparison of two first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors erlotinib or gefitinib as first-line treatment for CNS metastasis NSCLC patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations is yet to be elucidated. Methods A retrospective analysis was done on cerebral metastasis rate after erlotinib or gefitinib as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations. Time to neurological progression (nTTP) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) were calculated. Results The study involved 279 patients (erlotinib group: 108, gefitinib group: 171). After a median follow-up of 22?months, 27 patients (25%) in the erlotinib group and 60 patients (35.1%) in the gefitinib group showed CNS progression. The HR of CNS progression for erlotinib versus gefitinib was 0.695 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.406–1.190], suggesting a risk reduction of 30.5% although not achieving statistical significance. The 6-, 12- and 18-month cumulative CNS progression rates were 0.9, 3.7 and 12% for erlotinib compared with corresponding rates of 5.8, 9.4 and 17% for gefitinib ( P =?0.181). However, for those patients with preexisting brain metastases prior to EGFR-TKI treatment, erlotinib as first line treatment significantly extended the median nTTP in comparison to gefitinib (30?months vs 15.8?months, p =?0.024). Conclusions Our data show that nTTP can be effectively extended in preexisting brain metastases patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations initially treated with erlotinib compared with gefitinib. If confirmed, our results indicate that erlotinib may play an important role in controlling CNS progression from EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Key words EGFR-TKIs Erlotinib Gefitinib NSCLC EGFR mutation
机译:背景晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的中枢神经系统(CNS)脑转移使生活质量和预后降低。尚没有阐明两种第一代表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抑制剂厄洛替尼或吉非替尼作为中枢神经系统转移性NSCLC EGFR致敏突变患者的一线治疗的疗效比较。方法回顾性分析厄洛替尼或吉非替尼作为EGFR敏感性突变的晚期NSCLC患者的一线治疗后的脑转移率。计算了神经学进展时间(nTTP)和中位无进展生存期(mPFS)。结果该研究涉及279例患者(厄洛替尼组:108名,吉非替尼组:171名)。中位随访22个月后,厄洛替尼组27例(25%)和吉非替尼组60例(35.1%)表现为CNS进展。厄洛替尼vs吉非替尼的CNS进展的HR为0.695 [95%置信区间(CI),0.406-1.190],尽管未达到统计学意义,但风险降低了30.5%。厄洛替尼的6个月,12个月和18个月累积CNS进展率为0.9%,3.7%和12%,而吉非替尼分别为5.8%,9.4%和17%(P = 0.181)。但是,对于那些在EGFR-TKI治疗之前已经存在脑转移的患者,厄洛替尼作为一线治疗的疗效显着延长了吉非替尼的中位nTTP水平(30个月vs 15.8个月,p = 0.024)。结论我们的数据表明,与吉非替尼相比,nTTP可以有效地扩展已有的先有erlotinib治疗的EGFR致敏突变的脑转移患者。如果得到证实,我们的结果表明厄洛替尼可能在控制EGFR突变阳性NSCLC的CNS进展中起重要作用。关键词EGFR-TKIs厄洛替尼吉非替尼NSCLC EGFR突变

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号