首页> 外文期刊>Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment >Diversity of endophytic bacteria of Dendrobium officinale based on culture-dependent and culture-independent methods
【24h】

Diversity of endophytic bacteria of Dendrobium officinale based on culture-dependent and culture-independent methods

机译:基于培养和培养无关方法的铁皮石end内生细菌多样性

获取原文
           

摘要

ABSTRACT Culture-dependent and culture-independent methods were compared and evaluated in the study of the endophytic diversity of Dendrobium officinale . Culture-independent methods consisted of polymerase chain reaction?¢????denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) and metagenome methods. According to the results, differences were found between the three methods. Three phyla, namely Firmicutes , Proteobacteria , and Actinobacteria , were detected using the culture-dependent method, and two phyla, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria , were detected by the DGGE method. Using the metagenome method, four major phyla were determined, including Proteobacteria (76.54%), Actinobacteria (18.56%), Firmicutes (2.27%), and Bacteroidetes (1.56%). A distinct trend was obtained at the genus level in terms of the method and the corresponding number of genera determined. There were 449 genera and 16 genera obtained from the metagenome and DGGE methods, respectively, and only 7 genera were obtained through the culture-dependent method. By comparison, all the genera from the culture-dependent and DGGE methods were contained in the members determined using the metagenome method. Overall, culture-dependent methods are limited to ?¢????finding?¢???? endophytic bacteria in plants. DGGE is an alternative to investigating primary diversity patterns; however, the metagenome method is still the best choice for determining the endophytic profile in plants. It is essential to use multiphasic approaches to study cultured and uncultured microbes.
机译:摘要在研究铁皮石end内生菌多样性的研究中,比较和评估了依赖文化的方法和不依赖文化的方法。与培养无关的方法包括聚合酶链反应,变性梯度凝胶电泳(PCR-DGGE)和基因组学方法。根据结果​​,发现三种方法之间存在差异。使用依赖于培养的方法检测到三个菌种,即Fimicutes,Proteobacteria和Actinobacteria,使用DGGE方法检测了两个菌种,即Fimicutes和Proteobacteria。使用元基因组方法,确定了四个主要门,包括变形杆菌(76.54%),放线菌(18.56%),硬毛菌(2.27%)和拟杆菌(1.56%)。就方法和相应的属数而言,在属水平上获得了明显的趋势。通过基因组和DGGE方法分别获得449属和16属,通过培养依赖性方法仅获得7属。相比之下,使用元基因组方法确定的成员中包含了所有依赖于培养的方法和DGGE方法的属。总体而言,依赖于文化的方法仅限于“发现”方法。植物中的内生细菌。 DGGE是调查主要多样性模式的替代方法。然而,后基因组方法仍然是确定植物内生特征的最佳选择。使用多阶段方法来研究培养的和未培养的微生物是必不可少的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号