...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders >Quality of life, functional outcome, and voice handicap index in partial laryngectomy patients for early glottic cancer
【24h】

Quality of life, functional outcome, and voice handicap index in partial laryngectomy patients for early glottic cancer

机译:早期声门癌部分喉切除术患者的生活质量,功能结局和语音障碍指数

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background In this study, we aim to gather information about the quality of life issues, functional outcomes and voice problems facing early glottic cancer patients treated with the surgical techniques such as laryngofissure cordectomy, fronto-lateral laryngectomy, or cricohyoidopexi. In particular, consistency of life and voice quality issues with the laryngeal tissue excised during surgery is examined. In addition, the effects of arytenoidectomy to the life and voice quality are also studied. Methods 29 male patients were enrolled voluntarily in the study. The average age was 53.9 years. Three out of 10 patients with laryngofissure cordectomy also had arytenoidectomy. 11 patients had fronto-lateral laryngectomy with Tucker reconstruction, two of which also had arytenoidectomy. There were eight patients with cricohyoidopexi and bilateral functional neck dissection. Three of these patients also had arytenoidectomy. In bilateral functional neck dissection cases, spinal accessory nerve was preserved and level V of the neck was not dissected. None of the patients had neither radiotherapy nor voice therapy. Cordectomy patients never had a temporary tracheotomy or were connected to a feeding tube. Data was collected for 13 months for the cordectomy group, 14 months for fronto-lateral laryngectomy and cricohyoidopexi groups on average post-operatively. Statistical analysis in this study was carried out using the one-way analysis of variance, and the Post-Hoc group comparisons were made after Bonferroni and Scheffé-procedures. In order to determine the effects of arytenoidectomy, a regression analysis is carried out to see if there are statistical differences in answers given to the survey questions among patients who were arytenoidectomized during their surgeries. Results There was a statistically significant difference between cordectomy and cricohyoidopexi group in answers to the University of Washington- Quality of Life- Revised survey part 1. (p = 0). A statistically significant difference was also established between cordectomy and fronto-lateral laryngectomy groups, as well as between cordectomy and cricohyoidopexi groups in answers to the University of Washington- Quality of Life- Revised survey part 2. (p = 0,036 and p = 0.009, respectively). Cricohyoidopexi group has given the lowest scores and the cordectomy group has given the highest scores in three survey questions representing the quality of life, performances and new voices. These ranges are also consistent with the laryngeal tissue excised during surgery (cricohyoidopexi > fronto-lateral laryngectomy > cordectomy). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck cancer patients instrument. The difference between the Voice Handicap Index and Voice Handicap Index (functional); Voice Handicap Index (physical) and Voice Handicap Index (emotional) scores in three patient groups was not significant either. All of the patients evaluated that their new voices have similar functional, physical and emotional impact on their life. Decanulation and oral feeding times of cricohyoidopexi and fronto-lateral laryngectomy patients are found to be significantly longer than cordectomy patients. Lastly, the removal of arytenoid does not have any significant adverse effects on the quality of life, the functional outcomes, or the quality of voice. Conclusion In the present study, all patients with early glottic cancer, treated with different surgical technics reported fairly good quality of life outcomes, functional results and voice qualities. This study also finds that the removal of arytenoid does not have any adverse effects on the quality of life and voice from the patients' point of view.
机译:背景技术在这项研究中,我们旨在收集有关通过手术技术(例如喉头喉切除术,额侧喉切除术或环舌骨切除术)治疗的早期声门癌患者所面临的生活质量,功能结局和声音问题的信息。特别地,检查了手术期间切除的喉组织的生活和语音质量问题的一致性。此外,还研究了关节切除术对生活和声音质量的影响。方法自愿纳入29例男性患者。平均年龄为53.9岁。每10例喉咽清扫术患者中就有3例进行了类癌切除术。 11例患者经Tucker重建进行了前外侧喉切除术,其中2例也进行了关节突切除术。有8例环行舌环切开术和双侧功能性颈淋巴结清扫术。其中三名患者也接受了类癌切除术。在双侧功能性颈淋巴清扫术病例中,保留了脊柱副神经,并且未解剖出颈V级。没有患者既没有放射疗法也没有语音疗法。脐带摘除术的患者从未进行过临时气管切开术或从未与饲管相连。脐带切除术组平均收集术后13个月的数据,额外侧喉切除术和环结膜切除术组平均收集14个月的数据。本研究中的统计分析是使用方差的单向分析进行的,并且在Bonferroni和Scheffé程序之后进行了Hoc后组的比较。为了确定关节切除术的效果,进行了回归分析,以查看在手术期间进行了肛门切除术的患者中,对调查问题给出的答案是否存在统计差异。结果在华盛顿大学-生活质量修订调查表第1部分的回答中,脐带切除术和环行舌环切开术组之间存在统计学差异。(p = 0)。在华盛顿大学生活质量修订调查第2部分的回答中,在脐带切除术和额外侧喉切除术组之间以及脐带切除术和环行舌骨切除术组之间也建立了统计学上的显着差异。(p = 0,036和p = 0.009,分别)。在代表生活质量,表演和新声音的三个调查问题中,Cryohyoidopexi组的得分最低,而脐带切除术组的得分最高。这些范围也与手术过程中切除的喉组织一致(环舌骨膜>额外侧喉切除术>脐带切除术)。头颈部癌症患者的工作状态量表中各组之间无统计学差异。语音障碍指数和语音障碍指数(功能)之间的区别;三个患者组的语音障碍指数(身体)和语音障碍指数(情绪)得分也不显着。所有患者均评估出他们的新声音对其生活具有相似的功能,身体和情感影响。发现环舌骨切除术和额外侧喉切除术患者的排便和口服喂食时间显着长于脐带切除术患者。最后,去除类胡萝卜素不会对生活质量,功能结局或声音质量产生任何重大不利影响。结论在本研究中,所有接受了不同手术技术治疗的早期声门癌患者的生活结局,功能结局和声音质量均良好。这项研究还发现,从患者的角度来看,去除类胡萝卜素不会对生活质量和声音产生任何不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号