首页> 外文期刊>BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine >Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial

机译:针刺配合人工和电刺激治疗分娩痛:一项纵向随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Acupuncture is commonly used to reduce pain during labour despite contradictory results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture with manual stimulation and acupuncture with combined manual and electrical stimulation (electro-acupuncture) compared with standard care in reducing labour pain. Our hypothesis was that both acupuncture stimulation techniques were more effective than standard care, and that electro-acupuncture was most effective. Methods A longitudinal randomised controlled trial. The recruitment of participants took place at the admission to the labour ward between November 2008 and October 2011 at two Swedish hospitals . 303 nulliparous women with normal pregnancies were randomised to: 40?minutes of manual acupuncture (MA), electro-acupuncture (EA), or standard care without acupuncture (SC). Primary outcome: labour pain, assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes: relaxation, use of obstetric pain relief during labour and post-partum assessments of labour pain. The sample size calculation was based on the primary outcome and a difference of 15?mm on VAS was regarded as clinically relevant, this gave 101 in each group, including a total of 303 women. Results Mean estimated pain scores on VAS (SC: 69.0, MA: 66.4 and EA: 68.5), adjusted for: treatment, age, education, and time from baseline, with no interactions did not differ between the groups (SC vs MA: mean difference 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.7-6.9 and SC vs EA: mean difference 0.6 [95% CI] -3.6-4.8). Fewer number of women in the EA group used epidural analgesia (46%) than women in the MA group (61%) and SC group (70%) (EA vs SC: odds ratio [OR] 0.35; [95% CI] 0.19-0.67). Conclusions Acupuncture does not reduce women’s experience of labour pain, neither with manual stimulation nor with combined manual and electrical stimulation. However, fewer women in the EA group used epidural analgesia thus indicating that the effect of acupuncture with electrical stimulation may be underestimated. These findings were obtained in a context with free access to other forms of pain relief. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01197950 .
机译:背景技术尽管有矛盾的结果,但针灸通常用于减轻分娩时的疼痛。这项研究的目的是评估与标准护理相比,通过手动刺激进行针刺和通过手动与电刺激相结合的针灸(电针)在减轻劳动痛方面的有效性。我们的假设是,两种针刺刺激技术都比标准护理更有效,而电针疗法最有效。方法一项纵向随机对照试验。参加者的招募是在2008年11月至2011年10月期间在两家瑞典医院的劳务病房入院时进​​行的。 303名正常妊娠的未生育妇女被随机分为:40分钟的手动针灸(MA),电针(EA)或无针灸的标准护理(SC)。主要结果:分娩疼痛,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估。次要结果:放松,分娩时使用产科止痛药以及产后评估产后疼痛。样本量的计算是基于主要结局,在VAS上相差15?mm被认为具有临床意义,每组有101名患者,包括303名女性。结果VAS的平均估计疼痛评分(SC:69.0,MA:66.4和EA:68.5)经以下因素调整:治疗,年龄,教育程度和距基线的时间,两组之间无相互作用(SC vs MA:平均值)差异2.6、95%置信区间[CI] -1.7-6.9和SC与EA:平均差异0.6 [95%CI] -3.6-4.8。 EA组使用硬膜外镇痛的妇女人数较少(46%),而MA组(61%)和SC组的妇女人数较少(70%)(EA vs SC:优势比[OR] 0.35; [95%CI] 0.19 -0.67)。结论针刺既不能通过手动刺激,也不能通过手动和电动刺激相结合来减少女性的劳动痛苦。但是,EA组中使用硬膜外镇痛的妇女较少,因此表明电刺激针刺的效果可能被低估了。这些发现是在免费使用其他形式的疼痛缓解的情况下获得的。试用注册ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01197950。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号