首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Effect of dentin perfusion on the sealing ability and microtensile bond strengths of a total-etch versus an all-in-one adhesive
【24h】

Effect of dentin perfusion on the sealing ability and microtensile bond strengths of a total-etch versus an all-in-one adhesive

机译:牙本质灌注对全蚀刻与多合一粘合剂的密封能力和微拉伸结合强度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: To test the null hypothesis that perfusion of dentin has no effect on the sealing or bond strength in Class V resin composite restorations using a two-step total-etch (Scotchbond 1), or a one-step self-etch (all-in-one) (Prompt L-Pop) adhesive. Methods: Dentin permeability in Class V cavity preparations cut into extracted human third molars was measured in a fluid transport setup. Resin composites were placed using either Scotchbond 1, or Prompt L-Pop with or without dentin perfusion at 1.47 kPa. Permeability was re-measured, and the reduction in permeability was calculated as a percentage of the initial value. Additionally, microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin was measured. Results: Whereas the ability of Scotchbond 1 to seal dentin was significantly decreased due to dentin perfusion (p = 0.00025), that of Prompt L-Pop was not affected (p = 0.099). Scotchbond 1 produced significantly less dentinal seal than Prompt L-Pop only in the restorations carried out with perfusion (p = 0.0003), in the absence of perfusion, however, the difference was not significant (p = 0.343). Dentin perfusion significantly decreased the μTBS of Scotchbond 1 to dentin (p = 0.001). Due to excessive premature failure during sectioning, μTBS test could not be performed with Prompt L-Pop. Significance: Dentinal fluid flow may have detrimental effects on the sealing ability of dental adhesives depending on the type of adhesive used. Studies aiming to rank adhesives in relation to their sealing ability in vitro should not disregard dentin perfusion.
机译:目的:为了检验零假设,即使用两步全蚀刻(Scotchbond 1)或一步自蚀刻(全蚀刻),V型树脂复合修复物中牙本质的灌注对密封或粘合强度没有影响。合一)(提示L-Pop)胶粘剂。方法:在流体运输装置中,测量切成人类第三磨牙的V类腔制剂中的牙本质渗透性。使用Scotchbond 1或Prompt L-Pop在1.47 kPa进行牙本质灌注或不进行牙本质灌注的情况下放置树脂复合材料。重新测量磁导率,并以初始值的百分比计算磁导率的降低。另外,测量与牙本质的微拉伸粘合强度(μTBS)。结果:尽管Scotchbond 1密封牙本质的能力由于牙本质灌注而显着降低(p = 0.00025),但提示L-Pop的能力却未受到影响(p = 0.099)。仅在进行灌注(P = 0.0003)的修复体中,Scotchbond 1产生的牙本质封闭比Prompt L-Pop少得多(p = 0.0003),但是,差异不显着(p = 0.343)。牙本质灌注显着降低了Scotchbond 1与牙本质的μTBS(p = 0.001)。由于切片过程中过早的故障,无法使用Prompt L-Pop进行μTBS测试。含义:牙本质液流动可能对牙科用粘合剂的密封能力产生有害影响,具体取决于所用粘合剂的类型。旨在根据胶粘剂的体外密封能力对胶粘剂进行排名的研究不应忽略牙本质灌注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号