首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin
【24h】

Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin

机译:腔的形状和老化对六种胶粘剂与牙本质粘接效果的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect polymerization contraction stress may have on bond durability. Methods: Bonding effectiveness was assessed by micro-tensile bond strength testing (μTBS) and electron microscopy. The 蘐BS to flat dentin surfaces and in standardized cavities was determined (this after 1 day as well as 1 year water storage). Six adhesives representing all current classes were applied: two etch-and-rinse (OptiBond FL, Kerr; Scotchbond 1, 3M ESPE), two self-etch (Clearfil 5E Bond, Kuraray; Adper Prompt, 3M ESPE) and two glass-ionomer (Fuji Bond LC, GC; Reactmer, Shofu) adhesives. Results: The conventional 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesive OptiBond FL bonded most effectively to dentin, and appeared insensitive to polymerization shrinkage stress and water degradation. The 2-step self-etch adhesive Clearfil SE Bond most closely approached this superior bonding effectiveness and only slightly lost bond strength after 1-year water exposure. The 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesive Scotchbond 1 and the 'strong' 1-step self-etch adhesive Adper Prompt appeared very sensitive to cavity configuration and water-aging effects. The 2-step resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive Fuji Bond LC only suffered from shrinkage stress, but not from 1-year water-exposure. Remarkable also is the apparent repairability of the 'mild' 1-step glass-ionomer adhesive Reactmer when stored for 1 year in water, in spite of the very low 1-day μTBS. Significance: Simplified bonding procedures do not necessarily imply improved bonding performance, especially in the long term.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是确定聚合收缩应力可能对键的耐久性产生影响。方法:通过微拉伸粘合强度测试(μTBS)和电子显微镜评估粘合效果。确定了平坦牙本质表面和标准型腔中的蘐BS(这是在储存1天和1年后的)。应用了代表所有当前类别的六种粘合剂:两种蚀刻和冲洗(OptiBond FL,Kerr; Scotchbond 1,3M ESPE),两种自蚀刻(Clearfil 5E Bond,Kuraray; Adper Prompt,3M ESPE)和两种玻璃离聚物(Fuji Bond LC,GC; Reactmer,Shofu)粘合剂。结果:常规的三步蚀刻和冲洗粘合剂OptiBond FL最有效地粘合到牙本质上,并且对聚合收缩应力和水降解不敏感。两步自蚀刻胶粘剂Clearfil SE Bond最接近这种优异的胶粘效果,并且在接触水1年后仅略微丧失了胶粘强度。两步蚀刻和冲洗粘合剂Scotchbond 1和“强力”一步自蚀刻粘合剂Adper Prompt对型腔结构和水老化效果非常敏感。两步树脂改性的玻璃离聚物胶粘剂Fuji Bond LC仅遭受收缩应力,而未遭受1年的水暴露。尽管1天的μTBS值很低,但“温和”的1步玻璃离聚物粘合剂反应器在水中保存1年后仍具有明显的可修复性。启示:简化的粘合程序并不一定意味着粘合性能的改善,尤其是从长期来看。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号