首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Bond strength and interfacial characterization of eight low fusing porcelains to cp Ti
【24h】

Bond strength and interfacial characterization of eight low fusing porcelains to cp Ti

机译:八种低熔点瓷与cp Ti的结合强度和界面特性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives. The aim of this study was the interfacial characterization and the determination of bond strength of commercially available low fusing dental porcelain for Ti. Methods. Eight materials were included in this study: Duceratin, Duceratin Plus, Initial Ti, Ti-22, TiKrom, TitanKeramik, Triceram (powder) and Triceram (paste). Eight ISO 9693 bond characterization specimens from each porcelain were prepared according to manufacturers' instructions. One specimen from each group was embedded in acrylic resin and after metallographic preparation was studied under an SEM. Interfacial characterization was carried out with Backscattered Electron Imaging and X-ray EDS analysis operating in line scan mode. Metal-ceramic specimens were tested in three point bending at a crosshead speed of 1.5mm/min according to ISO 9693 requirements. Additionally the fracture mode (adhesive-cohesive) of all specimens was evaluated employing SEM/EDS analysis. The results of bond strength and adhesive percentage were statistically analysed with one-way ANOVA and SNK multiple comparison test (a = 0.05). Additionally the possible correlation between the bond strength and fracture mode was also tested using Pearson test. Results. Interfacial characterization showed the mutual diffusion of Ti, Si, 0 and La along the Ti-ceramic interface. Only in Tricerap (paste) Zr showed an increased concentration at the interface. The results of bond strength classified the materials in the following decreasing order: TiKrom > Duceratin > Initial Ti > Duceratin Plus > Ti-22 >Triceram(paste)>Triceram(powder)>TitanKeramik. No correlation (r = 0.132) between the fracture mode and bond strength of the selected material denoting that the fracture mode is irrelevant with the bond strength of Ti-ceramic joint and thus the former should not be applied for comparison among different materials.rnSignificance. According to the results of this study the materials tested provided great difference in interfacial analysis and bond strength with metallic Ti.
机译:目标。这项研究的目的是对钛的市售低熔点牙科瓷器进行界面表征和粘结强度的测定。方法。这项研究包括八种材料:Duceratin,Duceratin Plus,初始Ti,Ti-22,TiKrom,TitanKeramik,Triceram(粉末)和Triceram(糊剂)。根据制造商的说明,准备了每种瓷器的八个ISO 9693粘合特征样品。每组一个样品被埋入丙烯酸树脂中,并在金相制备后用SEM进行研究。界面表征是通过在行扫描模式下运行的反向散射电子成像和X射线EDS分析进行的。根据ISO 9693要求,以1.5mm / min的十字头速度在三点弯曲中测试了金属陶瓷样品。另外,使用SEM / EDS分析评估所有样品的断裂模式(粘合剂-内聚性)。使用单向方差分析和SNK多重比较测试对粘合强度和粘合百分比的结果进行统计分析(a = 0.05)。另外,还使用皮尔逊检验测试了粘合强度和断裂模式之间的可能相关性。结果。界面表征显示Ti,Si,0和La沿Ti-陶瓷界面相互扩散。仅在Tricerap(糊剂)中,Zr的界面浓度增加。粘结强度的结果按以下降序对材料进行分类:TiKrom> Duceratin>初始Ti> Duceratin Plus> Ti-22> Triceram(糊剂)> Triceram(粉末)> TitanKeramik。所选材料的断裂模式与粘结强度之间没有相关性(r = 0.132),表明断裂模式与钛陶瓷接头的粘结强度无关,因此前者不宜用于不同材料之间的比较。根据这项研究的结果,所测试的材料在界面分析和与金属Ti的结合强度方面提供了很大的不同。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dental materials》 |2010年第3期|264-273|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Uniuersity of Athens, 2 Thivon Str, Goudi 115 27, Athens, Greece;

    Priuate practice, Athens, Greece;

    Department of Dental Technology, School of Health and Care Profession, Technological Educational Institution of Athens, Athens, Greece;

    Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Uniuersity of Athens, 2 Thivon Str, Goudi 115 27, Athens, Greece;

    Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Uniuersity of Athens, 2 Thivon Str, Goudi 115 27, Athens, Greece;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    metal-ceramic; Ti porcelain; three point bending; SEM/EDS; interfacial characterization;

    机译:金属陶瓷钛瓷;三点弯曲;SEM / EDS;界面表征;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:47:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号