首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Longevity of materials for pit and fissure sealing-Results from a meta-analysis
【24h】

Longevity of materials for pit and fissure sealing-Results from a meta-analysis

机译:凹坑和裂缝密封材料的寿命-荟萃分析的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective. This meta-analysis investigates the clinical retention of pit and fissure sealants in relation to observation time and material type. Data, sources and study selection. A search in the MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases identified 2944 abstracts (published prior to 9/30/2011), of which 485 clinical publications were analyzed in detail. A total of 146 articles included information about sealant retention, with a minimum observation time of 2 years. These publications were analyzed to determine the retention rates of the various materials studied (UV-light-, light- and auto-polymerizing resin-based sealants, fluoride-releasing materials, compomers, flowable composites and glass-ionomer-cement-based sealants). The meta-analysis used random effects models for longitudinal logistic regression and Bayesian statistics. Results. As part of the systematic review, 98 clinical reports and 12 field trial reports were identified. Auto-polymerizing sealants had the longest observation time (up to 20 years) and were found to have a 5-year retention rate of 64.7% (95%CI = 57.1-73.1%), which was estimated from the meta-analysis model. Resin-based light-polymerizing sealants and fluoride-releasing products showed similar 5-year retention rates (83.8%, 95%CI = 54.9-94.7% and 69.9%, 95%CI = 51.5-86.5%, respectively) for completely retained sealants. In contrast to these high retention rates, poor retention rates were documented for UV-light-polymerizing materials, compomers and glass-ionomer-cement-based sealants (5-year retention rates were <19.3%). Retention rates for UV-light-polymerizing materials, compomers and glass ionomer-cement-based sealants were classified as inferior. Conclusions versus Significance. The results of this meta-analysis suggested that resin-based sealants can be recommended for clinical use. The faster and less error-prone clinical appli cation of light-polymerizing materials, however, makes them the preferred choice for daily dental practice.
机译:目的。这项荟萃分析研究了与观察时间和材料类型相关的凹坑和裂隙密封胶的临床保留率。数据,来源和研究选择。在MEDLINE,EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库中进行的搜索确定了2944个摘要(2011年9月30日之前发布),其中详细分析了485个临床出版物。总共146篇文章包含有关密封胶保留的信息,最短观察时间为2年。对这些出版物进行了分析,以确定所研究的各种材料的保留率(紫外线,光和自动聚合的树脂基密封胶,氟化物释放材料,复合体,可流动的复合材料和玻璃-离聚物-水泥基密封胶) 。荟萃分析使用随机效应模型进行纵向逻辑回归和贝叶斯统计。结果。作为系统评价的一部分,确定了98份临床报告和12份现场试验报告。自聚合密封剂的观察时间最长(长达20年),发现5年保留率为64.7%(95%CI = 57.1-73.1%),这是根据荟萃分析模型估算得出的。完全保留的密封剂的树脂基光聚合密封剂和氟释放产品的五年保留率相似(分别为83.8%,95%CI = 54.9-94.7%和69.9%,95%CI = 51.5-86.5%) 。与这些高保留率相比,紫外光聚合材料,复合体和玻璃离聚物-水泥基密封胶的保留率较差(5年保留率<19.3%)。紫外光聚合材料,共聚体和玻璃离聚物-水泥基密封胶的保留率较差。结论与意义。这项荟萃分析的结果表明,可推荐将树脂基密封胶用于临床。然而,光聚合材料的更快,更不易出错的临床应用使其成为日常牙科实践的首选。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dental materials》 |2012年第3期|p.298-303|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich,Germany;

    Institute of Medical Data Management, Biometrics, and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany;

    Department of Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University Hospital, Jena, Germany;

    Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich,Germany;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    meta-analysis; systematic review; pit and fissure sealants; clinical studies; caries prevention;

    机译:荟萃分析系统评价;坑缝密封剂;临床研究;预防龋齿;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:47:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号