首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >Institutionalizing the pro-democracy movements: the case of Zambia's Movement for Multiparty Democracy
【24h】

Institutionalizing the pro-democracy movements: the case of Zambia's Movement for Multiparty Democracy

机译:将民主运动制度化:赞比亚多党民主运动的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this contribution the challenges of political opposition is addressed through a focus on the problems of institutionalizing parties and party systems in sub-Saharan Africa. Challenges of party institutionalization in a context of political and economic liberalization, where external international donors have become an active part of these political processes, are illustrated through a case study of Zambia. Zambia is chosen as a case because it in many ways presents a ‘best-case scenario’ for democratic consolidation in sub-Saharan Africa. The political transition in 1991 saw a new party coming to power as the Movement for Multiparty Democracy (MMD) won the parliamentary elections with a large majority over the former one-party rule of the United Independence Party (UNIP). The electoral success of Zambia's pro-democracy movement was in part explained by its ties to civil society, most notably, the Zambian Congress of Trade Unions. The contribution will show that the combined effects of political and economic liberalization, and the political role played by external financial actors in these processes, have hindered the institutionalization of political parties in Zambia. The limited institutionalization, witnessed by weak ties to civil society, a limited membership and shallow organizational structures, provides a partial explanation for the executive dominance that has characterized Zambian politics after the 1991 democratic transitions.View full textDownload full textKeywordsdemocracy, party institutionalization, economic and political liberalization, sub-Saharan Africa, ZambiaRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.603469
机译:在这一贡献中,着重解决了撒哈拉以南非洲政党和政党制度制度化问题的政治反对派挑战。通过赞比亚的案例研究,说明了政治和经济自由化背景下政党制度化所面临的挑战,在这种情况下,外部国际捐助者已成为这些政治进程的积极组成部分。之所以选择赞比亚为例,是因为它在许多方面为撒哈拉以南非洲的民主巩固提供了“最佳方案”。在1991年的政治过渡中,随着多党民主运动(MMD)在议会选举中获胜,新政党上台,其中多数由联合独立党(UNIP)的前一党统治统治。赞比亚的民主运动在选举中取得了成功,部分原因是它与民间社会的关系,尤其是赞比亚工会代表大会。所作的贡献将表明,政治和经济自由化的综合影响以及外部金融参与者在这些进程中发挥的政治作用,阻碍了赞比亚政党的制度化。有限的制度化表现为与公民社会的薄弱联系,有限的成员资格和组织结构薄弱,这为1991年民主过渡后赞比亚政治的行政主导地位提供了部分解释。查看全文下载全文关键字民主,政党制度化,经济和社会政治自由化,非洲撒哈拉以南地区,赞比亚“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.603469

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2011年第5期|p.1106-1124|共19页
  • 作者

    Lise Raknerab*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号