首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >When government fails us: trust in post-socialist civil organizations
【24h】

When government fails us: trust in post-socialist civil organizations

机译:当政府使我们失败时:信任后社会主义民间组织

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The research for this article was motivated by a noticeable discrepancy between levels of participation and trust in post-socialist civil organizations. While civic participation in Central and Eastern Europe is almost nonexistent, levels of trust in post-socialist civil organizations compare favourably to those in Western Europe. The first aim of this article is to understand why citizens place relatively high trust in post-socialist civil organizations. The political context, within which civil organizations operate, reveals one explanation for the high levels of trust in civil organizations: government corruption dissuades citizens from relying on state institutions and creates a void that is filled by informal networks of association and civil organizations. Empirical evidence demonstrates that trust in civil organizations focused on socioeconomic and political development is higher among citizens who express concern about corruption in their country. The second aim of this article is to understand the discrepancy between levels of trust and civic participation. A novel interpretation of past findings suggests that civil organizations' effectiveness, professionalization, transactional capacity and orientation toward service provision may garner citizens' trust while parallel neglect of grassroots mobilization leaves civil organizations short of capitalizing on that trust. Civil organizations' limited focus on interest aggregation, mobilization and representation raises doubts as to whether observers of civil society in the region should look to these organizations as its core component.View full textDownload full textKeywordscivil society, nongovernmental organizations, trust, organizational membership, post-socialist EuropeRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.532623
机译:本文的研究是由于对后社会主义民间组织的参与程度和信任程度之间明显的差异所致。尽管几乎不存在中欧和东欧的公民参与,但对后社会主义民间组织的信任程度要比西欧高。本文的首要目的是了解为什么公民对后社会主义民间组织具有相对较高的信任。民间组织在其中运作的政治背景揭示了对民间组织高度信任的一种解释:政府腐败使公民无法依赖国家机构,并创造了由非正式协会和民间组织网络填补的空白。经验证据表明,对本国腐败表示担忧的公民对民间组织关注社会经济和政治发展的信任度更高。本文的第二个目的是了解信任水平和公民参与程度之间的差异。对过去发现的新颖解释表明,民间组织的有效性,专业化,交易能力和对服务提供的取向可能会赢得公民的信任,而对基层动员的同时忽视使民间组织无法利用这种信任。民间组织对利益聚集,动员和代表制的关注有限,这使人们对该地区的民间社会观察者是否应将这些组织作为其核心组成部分表示怀疑。查看全文下载全文关键词民间社会,非政府组织,信任,组织成员,职位-socialist EuropeRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”} ;添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.532623

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2011年第1期|p.160-183|共24页
  • 作者

    Dani M. Marinovaa*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号