首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >Two at one blow? The EU and its quest for security and democracy by political conditionality in the Western Balkans
【24h】

Two at one blow? The EU and its quest for security and democracy by political conditionality in the Western Balkans

机译:一击两击?欧盟及其在西巴尔干地区的政治条件对安全与民主的追求

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The EU is facing a serious conflict of objectives in the Western Balkans, primarily between security interests calling for the rapid integration of these countries and its interest in democratization, which demands a stricter democracy promotion agenda and cautions against a rushed enlargement round including unconsolidated states. I argue that the EU's approach, which enforces both security and democracy through one instrument, namely, political conditionality, has yielded only limited success and has contributed to the emergence of a conflict of objectives for a number of reasons. First, to render its conditionality policy credible and consistent, the EU has been forced to prioritize security at the expense of democracy promotion. Second, compliance patterns in the two areas have differed, resulting in a conditionality dilemma that forces the EU to sanction compliance or reward non-compliance. And third, the use of political conditionality in security issues has generated counterproductive side effects that may impede the consolidation of democracy. The case study of Macedonia empirically supports this argument. The study provides evidence for an argument that contradicts much of the literature on sequencing: democracy promotion should resume playing a significant role in the early stages of post-conflict transition.View full textDownload full textKeywordsdemocracy promotion, European Union, enlargement, conditionality, Western Balkans, MacedoniaRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.674360
机译:欧盟在西巴尔干地区面临着严重的目标冲突,主要是在要求这些国家迅速一体化的安全利益与对民主化的利益之间,这要求更严格的民主促进议程,并警告不要包括未合并国家在内的匆忙的扩大回合。我认为,欧盟通过一种手段(即政治附带条件)实施安全与民主的做法仅取得了有限的成功,并且出于多种原因促成了目标冲突的产生。首先,为了使其条件政策可信和一致,欧盟被迫以牺牲民主促进为代价将安全置于优先地位。第二,这两个领域的合规模式不同,导致条件困境,迫使欧盟制裁合规或奖励不合规。第三,在安全问题中使用政治条件产生了适得其反的副作用,可能会阻碍巩固民主。马其顿的案例研究从经验上证明了这一观点。这项研究提供了一个论证,该论证与许多有关先后次序的文献相矛盾:民主促进应该在冲突后过渡的早期阶段继续发挥重要作用。查看全文下载全文关键词民主促进,欧盟,扩大,附加条件,西巴尔干地区,马其顿相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布日期:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.674360

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2012年第3期|p.507-534|共28页
  • 作者

    Solveig Richtera*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号