首页> 外文学位 >Identity, discourse, and the impact of EU conditionality in the western Balkans.
【24h】

Identity, discourse, and the impact of EU conditionality in the western Balkans.

机译:身份,话语以及欧盟对巴尔干西部条件的限制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Much of the scholarship on Europeanization has explained eastern enlargement according to the logics of materialism or constructivism. Materialists argue that candidates' compliance with conditionality demands is rooted in strong external material incentives and a credible shot at membership, while constructivists point to shared identities, norms and values. These are valuable insights, yet they do not address a critical missing element---how the dispersion of ideas influences institutional outcomes in candidate states. This research demonstrates that in order for the EU to have a transformative impact on the political institutions of the states of former Yugoslavia, national political leaders must be able to communicate a satisfying narrative of EU legitimacy that resonates with national narratives of legitimacy when justifying policy choices. The project goes beyond an analysis of compliant/non-compliant behavior to unearth a greater understanding of how, at the hour of accession, elite discourse operates as an agent to reshape histories, form new identities, and mold preferences. Together these processes have profound policy implications for the new regimes, as they lead to decisions that are consequential for institutional development at both the EU and state level. In particular, using a combination of content analysis and an original elite survey, this research finds that elites' ability to express power through ideas and over ideas can transform power in ideas for the cases of Croatia and Serbia/Kosovo. For Croatia, this entails elites creating conditions whereby the public believes in the idea that EU membership represents an 'escape' from the Balkans as opposed to a 'return' to Europe. For Serbia/Kosovo, elites strive to convince citizens that EU membership signifies a 're-branding' of the Balkan image rather than an escape. The Serbia-Kosovo territorial dispute figures prominently in the picture as it pits new ideas---a re-branded 'European' Serbia---against old ideas wherein the Kosovo narrative is essential to Serbian national identity. Serbian elites work to persuade EU and national publics that these ideas are not in tension and promise to deliver on both---attain EU membership and keep Kosovo.
机译:关于欧洲化的许多学者根据唯物主义或建构主义的逻辑解释了东扩。唯物论者认为,候选人对条件性要求的遵守源于强大的外部物质激励和对成员资格的可信射击,而建构主义者则指出了共同的身份,规范和价值观。这些都是有价值的见解,但它们并未解决关键的缺失要素,即观念的分散如何影响候选国家的制度成果。这项研究表明,为了使欧盟对前南斯拉夫各州的政治机构产生变革性影响,各国政治领导人必须能够传达令人满意的欧盟合法性叙述,并在证明政策选择合理性时与国家合法性叙述产生共鸣。该项目超出了对合规/不合规行为的分析范围,可以更好地了解加入时的精英话语如何充当重塑历史,形成新身份和塑造偏好的媒介。这些过程加在一起对新政权产生了深远的政策影响,因为它们导致做出对欧盟和国家级机构发展都至关重要的决定。尤其是,通过结合内容分析和原始的精英调查,这项研究发现,精英们通过思想表达权力和超越思想的能力可以改变克罗地亚和塞尔维亚/科索沃案件中思想的权力。对于克罗地亚而言,这需要精英创造条件,使公众相信欧盟成员国代表着巴尔干半岛的“逃避”,而不是“重返欧洲”的观念。对于塞尔维亚/科索沃而言,精英们努力说服公民,欧盟的加入标志着巴尔干形象的“重塑”而不是逃脱。塞尔维亚-科索沃领土争端在画面中占据重要位置,因为它提出了新的想法-一种重新命名的“欧洲”塞尔维亚-反对旧的想法,在这些旧想法中,科索沃的叙述对塞尔维亚的民族认同至关重要。塞尔维亚精英努力说服欧盟和本国公众,认为这些想法并不紧张,并承诺继续实现既取得欧盟会员资格又保持科索沃的目标。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hartman, Luke Timothy.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston University.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University.;
  • 学科 Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 343 p.
  • 总页数 343
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号