首页> 外文期刊>Defence Studies >Montgomery's presentation of his plans for D-Day: a case of consent and evade?
【24h】

Montgomery's presentation of his plans for D-Day: a case of consent and evade?

机译:蒙哥马利对他的D日计划的介绍:是同意还是逃避?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This essay briefly describes the course of British 3rd Division's attempt to capture Caen on D-Day, before addressing the development of the operational plan, its 'ways' and 'means' drivers, and how it was presented and tested, to identify signs of 'consent and evade' behaviour or ambiguity within the command chain. The main finding, that the strongest indications of evasive behaviour are in Montgomery's actions, sets the scene for an examination of the drivers, risks and benefits of practising evasion as opposed to clarity for operational commanders today. While operational commanders need to have political skills, the essay concludes that, in contrast to World War II, today's political and media realities require a tight match of intentions and planning, which has the effect of strengthening the commander's grip on the campaign.
机译:本文简要介绍了英国第3师试图在D-Day捕获卡昂的过程,然后着手阐述运营计划的制定,其“方式”和“手段”驱动因素,以及如何提出和测试该计划,以识别卡昂的迹象。命令链中的“同意并逃避”行为或歧义。主要发现是逃避行为的最强烈迹象是蒙哥马利的行动,这为审查驾驶员,进行逃避行为的风险和好处(而不是如今的作战指挥官)提供了条件。尽管作战指挥官需要具备政治技巧,但本文的结论是,与第二次世界大战不同,当今的政治和媒体现实需要意图和计划的紧密结合,从而增强了指挥官对战役的控制力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Defence Studies》 |2011年第4期|p.657-671ⅵ|共16页
  • 作者

    JAMES BABBAGE;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号