...
首页> 外文期刊>Defence Science Journal >Viscoelastic Modelling of Solid Rocket Propellants using Maxwell Fluid Model
【24h】

Viscoelastic Modelling of Solid Rocket Propellants using Maxwell Fluid Model

机译:麦克斯韦流体模型对固体火箭推进剂的粘弹性建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Maxwell fluid model consisting of a spring and a dashpot in series is applied for viscoelastic characterisation of solid rocket propellants. Suitable values of spring constant and damping coefficient were employed by least square variation of errors for generation of complete stress-strain curve in uniaxial tensile mode for case-bonded solid propellant formulations. Propellants from the same lot were tested at different strain rates. It was observed that change in spring constant, representing elastic part was very small with strain rate but damping constant varies significantly with variation in strain rate. For a typical propellant formulation, when strain rate was raised from 0.00037/s to 0.185/s, spring constant K changed from 5.5 MPa to 7.9 MPa, but damping coefficient D was reduced from 1400 MPa-s to 4 MPa-s. For all strain rates, stress-strain curve was generated using Maxwell model and close matching with actual test curve was observed. This indicates validity of Maxwell fluid model for uniaxial tensile testing curves of case-bonded solid propellant formulations. It was established that at higher strain rate, damping coefficient becomes negligible as compared to spring constant. It was also observed that variation of spring constant is logarithmic with strain rate and that of damping coefficient follows power law. The correlation coefficients were introduced to ascertain spring constants and damping coefficients at any strain rate from that at a reference strain rate. Correlation for spring constant needs a coefficient H, which is function of propellant formulation alone and not of test conditions and the equation developeds .K_2 =K_1+ H× In{(dε_2/dt)l(dε_1/dt)}. Similarly for damping coefficient D also another constant S is introduced and prediction formula is given by D_2= D_1 × {(dε_2/dt)/(dε_1/dt)}~s. Evaluating constants H and S at different strain rates validate this mathematical formulation for different propellant formulations. Stress-strain curves for solid propellants can be generated at those strain rates at which actual testing is not possible. Close matching of test and predicted stress-strain curve indicates propellant behavior as visco-elastic Maxwell fluid.
机译:麦克斯韦流体模型由串联的弹簧和减震器组成,用于固体火箭推进剂的粘弹性表征。弹性系数和阻尼系数的适当值通过误差的最小二乘方差采用,以生成用于粘结壳体的固体推进剂配方的单轴拉伸模式下的完整应力-应变曲线。来自同一批次的推进剂在不同的应变速率下进行了测试。观察到,代表弹性部分的弹簧常数的变化随应变率的变化很小,而阻尼常数随应变率的变化而变化很大。对于典型的推进剂配方,当应变速率从0.00037 / s提高到0.185 / s时,弹簧常数K从5.5 MPa改变为7.9 MPa,而阻尼系数D从1400 MPa-s降低到4 MPa-s。对于所有应变率,使用麦克斯韦(Maxwell)模型生成应力-应变曲线,并观察到与实际测试曲线的紧密匹配。这表明了麦克斯韦流体模型对于粘结固体推进剂配方的单轴拉伸试验曲线的有效性。已经确定,在较高的应变率下,与弹簧常数相比,阻尼系数可以忽略不计。还观察到,弹簧常数的变化与应变率成对数关系,阻尼系数的变化遵循幂律。引入相关系数以确定在任何应变速率下的弹簧常数和阻尼系数与参考应变速率下的弹簧常数和阻尼系数。弹簧常数的相关性需要一个系数H,该系数H仅是推进剂配方的函数,而不是测试条件的函数,因此方程式发展为.K_2 = K_1 + H×In {(dε_2/ dt)l(dε_1/ dt)}。类似地,对于阻尼系数D,还引入了另一个常数S,并且预测公式由D_2 = D_1×{(dε_2/ dt)/(dε_1/ dt)}〜s给出。在不同应变率下评估常数H和S验证了此数学公式适用于不同的推进剂公式。固体推进剂的应力-应变曲线可以在无法进行实际测试的应变速率下生成。试验和预测的应力-应变曲线的紧密匹配表明推进剂的行为是粘弹性麦克斯韦流体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号