首页> 外文期刊>Decision support systems >The order effect on online review helpfulness: A social influence perspective
【24h】

The order effect on online review helpfulness: A social influence perspective

机译:顺序对在线评论有用性的影响:一种社会影响力的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Review helpfulness is receiving increasing attention by academics and practitioners along with the growing problem of information overload in the Internet age. Prior studies on online review helpfulness mainly focus on the direct influences of review- and reviewer-specific characteristics. An implicit underlying assumption of these studies is that reviews for a given product are independent of each other. As such, the existence of social influence among reviewers is much overlooked in the literature on review helpfulness. To fill this gap, this study as a first attempt to explore the order effect on review helpfulness, aims to investigate whether, how, and why the order of a review will affect review helpfulness from a social influence perspective. With an analysis of 70,610 restaurant reviews collected from Yelp.com, this study finds that the order of a review negatively relates to review helpfulness. Moreover, the negative effect of review order on review helpfulness is weakened when the reviewer has more social connectedness or a higher level of expertise, or when the review is more negative in content or more recently posted. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:随着互联网时代信息过载的日益严重,评论的帮助越来越受到学者和从业者的关注。先前有关在线评论有用性的研究主要集中在评论者和审阅者特定特征的直接影响上。这些研究的一个隐含基础假设是,给定产品的评论彼此独立。这样,在评论有用性的文献中,评论者之间社会影响力的存在被大大地忽略了。为了填补这一空白,本研究首次尝试探索顺序对评论有用性的影响,旨在从社会影响的角度研究评论的顺序是否,如何以及为什么会影响评论有用性。通过对从Yelp.com收集的70,610条餐厅评论进行分析,该研究发现评论的顺序与评论的帮助程度负相关。此外,当审阅者具有更多的社交联系或更高的专业水平时,或者当审阅内容的负面程度更高或发布时间更近时,审阅顺序对审阅帮助的负面影响会减弱。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号