首页> 外文期刊>The data base for advances in information systems >Returning to the Philosophical Roots of Sociomateriality - How M. Heidegger and M. McLuhan Questioned Information Communication Technology
【24h】

Returning to the Philosophical Roots of Sociomateriality - How M. Heidegger and M. McLuhan Questioned Information Communication Technology

机译:回到社会物质性的哲学根源-海德格尔和麦克卢汉先生如何质疑信息通信技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Sociomateriality is a growing research stream in the field of IS. In response to an increasingly complex and interconnected world, sociomateriality researchers have proposed a view of relational ontological fusion. This view transcends the conventional framework of assuming a clear distinction between the social and the material. In this paper, we argue that the fundamental difference between sociomateriality and the conventional view lies on the ontological level, not on the epistemological or methodological levels. But without a return to its philosophical roots, sociomateriality remains obscure and confusing. To better inform researchers, we return to the original works of two Western philosophers, Heidegger and McLuhan, who both share the view of ontological fusion in proposing their arguments on how the entanglement of technology and the human agent precludes access to a primordial truth. In this paper, we reflect on these philosophical works, providing a solid foundation for this new approach. We argue that the sociomateriality approach can open the black box of the epistemological bias that stems from habitual systemic thinking. This study contributes to the less-researched area of unintentional consequences of technology. The paper also provides practical, alternative methods that can help in furthering this approach in future studies.
机译:社会重要性是信息系统领域研究的不断发展。为了应对日益复杂和相互联系的世界,社会重要性研究人员提出了关系本体融合的观点。这种观点超越了假定社会和物质之间有明显区别的传统框架。在本文中,我们认为社会物质性和传统观点之间的根本区别在于本体论层面,而不是认识论或方法论层面。但是,没有回到其哲学根源,社会物质性仍然晦涩难懂。为了更好地为研究人员提供信息,我们返回两位西方哲学家海德格尔和麦克卢汉的原创作品,他们在提出关于技术与人类行为的纠缠如何排除获取原始真理的论点时,都提出了本体论融合的观点。在本文中,我们对这些哲学著作进行了反思,为这种新方法提供了坚实的基础。我们认为,社会物质主义方法可以打开源自习惯性系统思维的认识论偏见的黑匣子。这项研究有助于研究较少的技术意外后果。本文还提供了实用的替代方法,可以帮助在将来的研究中进一步推广这种方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号