首页> 外文期刊>Dao >Skepticism and the Neo-Confucian Canon: Itō Jinsai’s Philosophical Critique of the Great Learning
【24h】

Skepticism and the Neo-Confucian Canon: Itō Jinsai’s Philosophical Critique of the Great Learning

机译:怀疑论和新儒家佳能:itōjinsai的伟大学习哲学批判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study examines Itō Jinsai’s 伊藤仁斎 (1627–1705) criticisms of the Great Learning (C: Daxue 大學 J: Daigaku). Three primary sources are considered: Jinsai’s Shigi sakumon 私擬策問 (Personal Essays, 1668); the Daigaku teihon 大學定本 (The Definitive Text of the Great Learning, manuscript 1685); and his essay, “Daigaku wa Kōshi no isho ni arazaru no ben” 大學非孔氏之遺書辨 (The Great Learning is not a Writing Confucius Transmitted, 1705), appended to his Gomō jigi 語孟字義. The study suggests that Jinsai’s critical inclinations grew from his acceptance of Zhu Xi’s views about the value of doubt for progress in learning. The study also suggests that Jinsai’s thinking on the Great Learning had political implications derived in many respects from Jinsai’s overall approach to philosophizing via analysis of words and their meanings.
机译:本研究审查了ōō金的伊藤仁斎(1627-1705)批评了伟大的学习(C:Daxue大学J:Daigaku)。 考虑了三个主要来源:金泰的Shigi Sakumon私拟私拟策(个人散文,1668); Daigaku Teihon大学定本(伟大学习的明确文本,稿件1685); 和他的文章,“Daigaku WaKōshino isho ni arazaru没有ben”大学非孔氏之遗书架(伟大的学习不是写孔子传播,1705),附加到他的Gomōjigi语孟字义。 该研究表明,金泰的批判倾向从他接受了朱熹的对学习进步的价值的看法。 该研究还表明,金泰对伟大学习的思考在何思泰于通过分析言语和意义上的哲学方法中获得了许多方面的政治影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号