【24h】

Autopoietic Power

机译:自生能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article presents an analysis of power that is very different from classical political science frameworks. It integrates Luhmann's theory of self-referential social systems into his theory of power and thereby exposes a theory that can match the major French analyses and genealogies of power. Furthermore, the theory enlarges the scope of power from a material and a social dimension to that of mastering temporalities. The article suggests that power (pouvoir, Macht) emerged as a concept used in the organization of time as presence/absence and thereby power synchronized and coordinated representation and delegation. To catch this problem of historical sociology, I use and reconstruct Niklas Luhmann's enormous theory of self-referential systems that is strong in temporal analysis, yet weak as a theory of self-referential power. The materials are drawn from historical state-building. Over a thousand years power developed from an invisible hybrid form into a certain form of visibility and later differentiated only for more recently again to turn into a form of hybridity.
机译:本文介绍了一种与古典政治科学框架完全不同的权力分析。它将卢曼的自我参照社会制度理论整合到他的权力理论中,从而揭示了一种可以与法国主要的权力分析和谱系相匹配的理论。此外,该理论将权力的范围从物质和社会维度扩大到掌握时间性。文章认为,权力(poouvoir,Macht)作为一种概念存在于时间的组织中,作为时间的存在/不存在,从而实现了权力的同步,协调表示和委派。为了解决历史社会学的这个问题,我使用并重建了尼古拉斯·卢曼(Niklas Luhmann)的巨大的自我指称系统理论,该理论在时间分析上很强,但在自我指称能力方面却很弱。这些材料取材于历史悠久的国家建设。一千年来,力量从一种看不见的混合形式发展为某种形式的可见性,后来又分化了,直到最近再次转变为一种混合形式。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cybernetics & Human Knowing》 |2017年第2期|41-67|共27页
  • 作者

    Gorm Harste;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Political Science and Government, Aarhus University, Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:27:26

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号