...
首页> 外文期刊>Current Surgery Reports >Endoscopic Thyroidectomy: A Literature Review and Update
【24h】

Endoscopic Thyroidectomy: A Literature Review and Update

机译:内镜甲状腺切除术:文献综述和更新。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Since the first report of endoscopic subtotal parathyroidectomy in 1996, a variety of endoscopic surgical approaches has been reported. These endoscopic approaches include the minimally-invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT), the endoscopic lateral approach, the lateral mini-incision approach, the anterior/chest (hybrid) approach, the transaxillary approach, the axillo-breast approach, the post-auricular and axillary approach, and other novel experimental approaches. Some of these approaches could be done with the assistance of the da Vinci robot (i.e. robotic-assisted thyroidectomy). For simplification, these approaches could be categorized into the cervical/direct approach and the extra-cervical/indirect approach. Each technique or approach has its own benefits and weaknesses. Currently, there is no preferred approach in the literature and the choice seems to be determined by the surgeon’s own experience and the patient’s preference. In our experience, the transaxillary approach was a technically more challenging procedure and was associated with longer hospital stay, longer operating time, more immediate pain, and increased overall RLN injury and morbidity than MIVAT. The 6-month scar appearance and patient satisfaction were similar between the two procedures.
机译:自从1996年首次报道内镜下全副甲状腺切除术以来,已经报道了各种内镜手术方法。这些内窥镜检查方法包括微创电视辅助甲状腺切除术(MIVAT),内窥镜侧入路检查法,侧向微型切口入路检查,前/胸(混合)入路检查,经腋窝入路检查,腋窝-乳房入路检查,耳和腋窝入路,以及其他新颖的实验方法。其中一些方法可以在达芬奇机器人(即机器人辅助甲状腺切除术)的帮助下完成。为简化起见,可以将这些方法分为宫颈/直接方法和宫颈/间接方法。每种技术或方法都有其自身的优点和缺点。当前,文献中没有首选的方法,选择似乎取决于外科医生的经验和患者的喜好。根据我们的经验,与MIVAT相比,经腋窝入路在技术上更具挑战性,并且与住院时间更长,手术时间更长,更直接的疼痛以及RLN总体损伤和发病率增加有关。两种手术之间6个月的疤痕外观和患者满意度相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号