首页> 外文期刊>Culture, Theory and Critique >Jean-François Lyotard on Differends and Unpresentable Otherness: Can God Escape the Clutches of the Christian Master Narrative?
【24h】

Jean-François Lyotard on Differends and Unpresentable Otherness: Can God Escape the Clutches of the Christian Master Narrative?

机译:让-弗朗索瓦·利奥塔(Jean-FrançoisLyotard)论差异和无与伦比的异性:上帝能逃脱基督教大师叙事的离合器吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, I first elaborate on Jean-François Lyotard's postmodern critical approach, which is concerned with the way we deal with irresolvable conflicts, especially our forgetfulness of the ternes that is at stake in such conflicts. The plea of this French philosopher to respect and bear witness to the event of heterogeneity, which accompanies all discourse may open up new possibilities to think difference, otherness, and transcendence without falling back into the pattern of a grand narrative. Whether any of this constitutes what might be considered hidden traces of God in Lyotard, however, is far from sure. Nevertheless, his criticism of Christianity and also the urge to bear witness to the differend may appeal to theology. In order to further develop the potential of this theological perspective, I take Lyotard's criticism of the Christian grand narrative and his appeal to the ‘dark God’ of the Jews as a point of departure. I conclude with some critical-constructive theological indications regarding the way that a Christian ‘open’ narrative may result from such a conversation with Lyotard's postmodern act of bearing witness to the differend.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2011.632592
机译:在本文中,我首先详细阐述让·弗朗索瓦·利奥塔(Jean-FrançoisLyotard)的后现代批评方法,该方法与我们处理无法解决的冲突的方式有关,尤其是我们对此类冲突中处于危险中的问题的遗忘。这位法国哲学家呼吁尊重和见证异质性事件,这种异质性事件伴随着所有的话语,可能会开辟新的可能性来思考差异,其他性和超越性,而不会退回到宏大叙事的模式。然而,其中任何一项是否构成了在利奥塔德中可能被认为是上帝隐藏的痕迹,尚不确定。然而,他对基督教的批评以及为不同派作证的渴望可能会吸引神学。为了进一步发展这种神学观点的潜力,我将利奥塔对基督教大叙事的批评以及他对犹太人“黑暗之神”的呼吁作为出发点。最后,我以一些批判性的神学指示来说明基督教的“开放”叙事可能是通过与Lyotard的后现代行为进行对话而产生的,这种行为是见证了对另一端的见证。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand: “泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2011.632592

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号