首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Studies >Cultural policy as rhetoric and reality: a comparative analysis of policy making in the peripheral north of England
【24h】

Cultural policy as rhetoric and reality: a comparative analysis of policy making in the peripheral north of England

机译:修辞和现实的文化政策:英格兰北部外围政策制定的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Any understanding of the relationship between place and cultural policy has largely been lost as part of a rhetorical critique of a neo-liberal regeneration which has, in turn, undermined the disciplinary basis of cultural policy. This has had particular consequences for our understanding of the impact of cultural policy in the peripheral north of England. Despite the political realities of geographical peripherality that still persist today, there are very few examples of research designed to address the ways in which cultural policy has been operationalized in the context of peripheral political cultures. This article presents findings from comparative research on cultural policy in Liverpool and NewcastleGateshead, with specific focus on the role of local government in cultural policy making, to show the importance of local political culture in shaping cultural policy. The intention therefore is to demystify the role of cultural policy beyond its value as a rhetorical policy device in a global economy to understand how such policy is used in practice to validate notions of the political particular. The aim is therefore to bridge the empirical gap between global and local assumptions about the role of cultural policy, whilst exploring the institutions underpinning local leadership and collaboration in arts and cultural policy.View full textDownload full textKeywordsEuropean Capital of Culture, Liverpool, NewcastleGateshead, cultural policy, local policy making, political cultureRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548961003695940
机译:作为对新自由主义复兴的修辞批评的一部分,人们对地方与文化政策之间关系的任何理解都在很大程度上丧失了,这反过来又破坏了文化政策的学科基础。这对我们对英格兰北部边缘地区文化政策的影响的理解产生了特别的影响。尽管当今仍然存在着地理上的外围政治现实,但很少有研究旨在说明在外围政治文化背景下实施文化政策的方式的研究实例。本文介绍了利物浦和纽卡斯尔盖茨黑德文化政策比较研究的发现,特别关注了地方政府在文化政策制定中的作用,以表明地方政治文化在塑造文化政策中的重要性。因此,其目的是揭开文化政策在全球经济中作为修辞政策工具的价值之外的作用的神秘感,以了解在实践中如何使用该政策来验证政治特殊性的概念。因此,目的是弥合全球和地方对文化政策作用的假设之间的经验差距,同时探索支撑地方在艺术和文化政策方面的领导和合作的机构。查看全文下载全文关键字欧洲文化之都,利物浦,纽卡斯尔盖茨黑德,文化政策,当地政策制定,政治文化相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548961003695940

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号