...
首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Studies of Science Education >The linguistic construction of expert identity in professor–student discussions of science
【24h】

The linguistic construction of expert identity in professor–student discussions of science

机译:教授-学生科学讨论中专家身份的语言建构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examines how participation in a verbal exchange during an inquiry-based classroom activity allows three college students and their science instructor to use linguistic signs (choices of words, grammatical structures, discursive structures, prosody and poetic discourse) to construct authority and expertise. Our work explores linguistic and interactional processes of identification (the dynamic construction and transaction of expert identity) and examines how discursive strategies adopted by the professor at different moments of the verbal exchange influence the students’ subsequent discursive practices and perceptions of authority. We adopt a dialogic, socio-constructivist perspective on identity, viewing personal identities as being partially constructed via interactional positioning. Our findings reveal that the attainment of expertise involves two different types of language-mediated processes: the transmission of a professional vision or intension and the emergence of a perception of agency among students. The former is centered on referential-denotative meanings of speech (elicitation of standard account and operational definition) while the latter requires effective use of pragmatic–performative functions of speech (non-evaluative and more than minimal recipient practices). Consideration is given to the need for science instructors to be able to utilize pragmatic functions of language strategically to encourage students to position themselves within the identity of science expertise.
机译:这项研究探讨了在基于查询的课堂活动中参与语言交流如何使三名大学生及其科学指导者使用语言符号(单词选择,语法结构,话语结构,韵律和诗意话语)来构建权威和专业知识。我们的工作探索身份认同的语言和交互过程(专家身份的动态构建和交易),并研究教授在口头交流的不同时刻采用的话语策略如何影响学生随后的话语行为和权威观念。我们对身份采用对话,社会建构主义的观点,认为个人身份是通过互动定位而部分构建的。我们的发现表明,专业知识的获得涉及两种不同类型的语言介导的过程:专业视野或意图的传递以及学生对代理的理解的出现。前者的重点是言语的指称性含义(标准账目和操作定义的引申),而后者则要求有效地使用语用-表现性的言语功能(非评价性的,并且不仅仅是最小的接受者做法)。考虑到科学导师必须能够策略性地利用语言的语用功能,以鼓励学生将自己置于科学专业知识的地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号