首页> 外文期刊>Critical Studies on Terrorism >Deadliness, organisational change and suicide attacks: understanding the assumptions inherent in the use of the term a??new terrorisma??
【24h】

Deadliness, organisational change and suicide attacks: understanding the assumptions inherent in the use of the term a??new terrorisma??

机译:致命性,组织变革和自杀式袭击:了解使用“新恐怖主义”一词固有的假设。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study examines the use of the term a??new terrorisma?? in a sample of the literature on terrorism, to identify whether the term represents a stable concept within the field, is of analytic value to terrorism research or is a phrase that merely identifies an unquantified concept. A content analysis of articles published in the journal Studies in Conflict and Terrorism from 1992 to 2011 was used as a literature sample to identify the most frequently cited features of new terrorism. The results of the analysis demonstrate that there was little consistent use of the phrase a??new terrorisma?? and the most common feature linked to it was only present in 25% of the articles. Three of the prominent features discovered in the content analysis are examined in greater detail: increased deadliness, new organisational structures (in particular, the leaderless phenomenon) and suicide terrorism. A common claim in the literature - of a decrease in the frequency of the attacks but an increase in the lethality per attack - seems to have been a short-term trend between 1992 and 2005. Since this time, the trend has reversed. Historical analysis was used to assess the notion of change in the organisational structure. This analysis allowed the authors to identify precursors of the a??newa?? organisational structures. Early groups such as the Anarchists were found to use a similar concept of decentralised command with varying degrees of success. Similarly, historical precursors of suicide terrorism were found, even though the recent exponential growth in the use of suicide terrorism by modern terrorist organisations could be considered as quantitatively a??newa??. This study concludes that the new terrorism represents a loose association of tactics, provides limited value to terrorist research, and represents not a category identifiable by novel features, but rather a loose referral to the perceived importance and threat of terrorism.View full textDownload full textKeywordsnew terrorism, organisational innovation, deadliness, suicide terrorism, religious terrorismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2012.692512
机译:这项研究研究了“新恐怖主义”一词的使用。在有关恐怖主义的文献样本中,要确定该术语代表的是领域内的稳定概念,对恐怖主义研究具有分析价值,还是仅表示未量化概念的短语。对1992年至2011年发表在《冲突与恐怖主义研究》杂志上的文章进行了内容分析,以此作为文献样本,以确定最常被引用的新恐怖主义特征。分析结果表明,几乎没有一致使用“新恐怖主义”一词。并且与之相关的最常见功能仅出现在25%的文章中。内容分析中发现的三个主要特征将被更详细地检查:期限增加,新的组织结构(特别是无领导者现象)和自杀式恐怖主义。在文献中,一个共同的主张-袭击的频率降低,但每次袭击的致死率增加-似乎是1992年至2005年之间的短期趋势。自那时以来,这种趋势已经逆转。历史分析被用来评估组织结构变化的概念。该分析使作者能够确定“ newa”的前体。组织结构。人们发现,诸如无政府主义者之类的早期组织使用了类似的分散指挥概念,并取得了不同程度的成功。同样,尽管近代恐怖组织对自杀式恐怖主义的使用呈指数增长,但从数量上可以认为是“新事物”,但发现了自杀式恐怖主义的历史先兆。这项研究得出的结论是,新的恐怖主义代表了一种松散的战术组合,为恐怖主义研究提供了有限的价值,并且代表的不是新颖特征可识别的类别,而是代表对恐怖主义的感知重要性和威胁的宽松引用。查看全文下载全文全文恐怖主义,组织创新,最后期限,自杀式恐怖主义,宗教恐怖主义有关的变量add add_id ,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”:true,“ ui_click”:true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2012.692512

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号