首页> 外文OA文献 >Deadliness, organisational change and suicide attacks:understanding the assumptions inherent in the use of the term ‘new terrorism’
【2h】

Deadliness, organisational change and suicide attacks:understanding the assumptions inherent in the use of the term ‘new terrorism’

机译:致命性,组织变革和自杀式袭击:理解使用“新恐怖主义”一词固有的假设

摘要

This study examines the use of the term ‘new terrorism’ in a sample of the literature on terrorism, to identify whether the term represents a stable concept within the field, is of analytic value to terrorism research or is a phrase that merely identifies an unquantified concept. A content analysis of articles published in the journal Studies in Conflict and Terrorism from 1992 to 2011 was used as a literature sample to identify the most frequently cited features of new terrorism. The results of the analysis demonstrate that there was little consistent use of the phrase ‘new terrorism’ and the most common feature linked to it was only present in 25% of the articles. Three of the prominent features discovered in the content analysis are examined in greater detail: increased deadliness, new organisational structures (in particular, the leaderless phenomenon) and suicide terrorism. A common claim in the literature – of a decrease in the frequency of the attacks but an increase in the lethality per attack – seems to have been a short-term trend between 1992 and 2005. Since this time, the trend has reversed. Historical analysis was used to assess the notion of change in the organisational structure. This analysis allowed the authors to identify precursors of the ‘new’ organisational structures. Early groups such as the Anarchists were found to use a similar concept of decentralised command with varying degrees of success. Similarly, historical precursors of suicide terrorism were found, even though the recent exponential growth in the use of suicide terrorism by modern terrorist organisations could be considered as quantitatively ‘new’. This study concludes that the new terrorism represents a loose association of tactics, provides limited value to terrorist research, and represents not a category identifiable by novel features, but rather a loose referral to the perceived importance and threat of terrorism.
机译:这项研究考察了有关恐怖主义文献的样本中“新恐怖主义”一词的使用,以确定该词是否代表该领域内的稳定概念,对恐怖主义研究具有分析价值,还是仅表示未量化的短语概念。对1992年至2011年发表在《冲突与恐怖主义研究》杂志上的文章进行了内容分析,以此作为文献样本,以确定最常被引用的新恐怖主义特征。分析结果表明,“新恐怖主义”一词很少得到一致使用,与之相关的最常见特征仅出现在文章的25%中。内容分析中发现的三个主要特征将被更详细地检查:期限增加,新的组织结构(特别是无领导者现象)和自杀式恐怖主义。在文献中,一个共同的主张是:袭击的频率降低,但每次袭击的致死率却有所增加,这似乎是1992年至2005年之间的短期趋势。自那时以来,这种趋势已经逆转。历史分析被用来评估组织结构变化的概念。通过分析,作者可以确定“新”组织结构的前身。人们发现,诸如无政府主义者之类的早期组织使用了类似的分散指挥概念,并取得了不同程度的成功。同样,尽管近代恐怖组织对自杀式恐怖主义的使用呈指数增长,但在数量上可以认为是“新的”,但发现了自杀式恐怖主义的历史前兆。这项研究得出的结论是,新的恐怖主义代表了一种松散的战术组合,为恐怖主义研究提供了有限的价值,并且代表的不是新颖特征可识别的类别,而是对恐怖主义的重要性和威胁的宽松指称。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lynch Orla; Ryder Chris;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号