首页> 外文期刊>Critical Public Health >Health education-the case for rehabilitation
【24h】

Health education-the case for rehabilitation

机译:健康教育-康复案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The emergence of health promotion in the 1980s was a direct response to critiques of health education which centred on its victim-blaming orientation and a growing appreciation of the need to address the wider determinants of health and health-related behaviour. This paper argues a priori that such critiques centre on a preventive model of health education and overlook its broader potential. It reviews a number of alternative models of health education and locates these within the core values of equity and empowerment which underpin the Ottawa Charter and subsequent WHO documents. It suggests that, despite the rhetoric of health promotion, practice frequently remained focused on individual behaviour change and the use of persuasive health education. The move to health promotion effectively stifled further debate about the broader role of health education in achieving individual empowerment and social change. This paper calls for a broader conceptualisation of health education-the New Health Education-and concludes that this should be the driving force behind health promotion.
机译:1980年代出现的健康促进是对健康教育批评的直接反应,这种批评以其责备受害者为导向,并日益意识到有必要解决更广泛的健康决定因素以及与健康有关的行为。本文先验地认为,这种批评集中在健康教育的预防模式上,却忽视了其更广泛的潜力。它审查了许多健康教育的替代模式,并将它们定位在公平和赋权的核心价值观之内,这些价值观是《渥太华宪章》及其后世界卫生组织文件的基础。它表明,尽管采取了促进健康的措施,实践仍然经常集中于个人行为的改变和有说服力的健康教育的使用。促进健康的举动有效地遏制了关于健康教育在实现个人赋权和社会变革中的更广泛作用的进一步辩论。本文呼吁对健康教育进行更广泛的概念化-新健康教育,并得出结论,这应该是促进健康的动力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号