首页> 外文期刊>Critical Public Health >High roads and low roads in HIV/AIDS programming: plea for a diversification of itinerary
【24h】

High roads and low roads in HIV/AIDS programming: plea for a diversification of itinerary

机译:艾滋病毒/艾滋病规划的高路和低路:呼吁多样化行程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic has given rise to multiple responses at multiple levels. In this article, a distinction is made between high-road and low-road solutions. High-road solutions typically address the disease and people as patients, focus on cure, treatment and pharmaceutical programmes, are noteworthy biomedical and technological, typically seen as ‘hard’ and top-down. Low-road solutions typically promote health and wellness among communities, focus on care, prevention and educational programmes, are often noteworthy rights based and holistic, typically seen as ‘soft’ and bottom-up. Whereas the sexual and reproductive health and rights movement characteristically takes the low road, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/AIDS programming seems to have drifted away from this broader agenda [Germain, A., Dixon-Mueller, R., and Sen, G., 2009. Back to basics: HIV/AIDS belongs with sexual and reproductive health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87, 840-845] and to increasingly prefer the high road. This article critically reflects on those developments, understanding them within a context of conservative moralism, medicalisation of sexuality, neoliberal economics and corporate financial interests. The main argument is that the merits of high-road programming are many, but that it does not well provide for important structural solutions for the larger population, nor are larger development issues well served. The present advances in the direction of itinerary change and restoring the necessary balance with low-road programming are being considered.View full textDownload full textKeywordsHIV/AIDS, sexual and reproductive health and rights, prevention, medicalisation, developmentRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2010.539594
机译:获得性免疫缺陷综合症(艾滋病)的流行已引起多个层面的多重反应。在本文中,区分了公路解决方案和公路解决方案。公路解决方案通常针对患者的疾病和人群,专注于治疗,治疗和药物治疗,是值得注意的生物医学和技术,通常被视为“困难”且自上而下。低道路解决方案通常会促进社区之间的健康和保健,侧重于护理,预防和教育计划,通常是基于权利和整体性的值得注意的做法,通常被视为“软”和自下而上。尽管性健康和生殖健康与权利运动通常走低路,但人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)/ AIDS计划似乎已经偏离了这一更广泛的议程[Germain,A.,Dixon-Mueller,R.和Sen,G ,2009年。回到基础:艾滋病毒/艾滋病属于性健康和生殖健康。 《世界卫生组织简报》,第87卷,第840-845页),并且越来越喜欢公路。本文对这些发展进行了批判性的反思,在保守的道德主义,性医学化,新自由主义经济学和公司财务利益的背景下理解了这些发展。主要论点是,公路规划的优点很多,但是它不能为更多的人口提供重要的结构性解决方案,也不能很好地解决较大的发展问题。正在考虑在路线变化方向上的最新进展,并正在考虑通过低路编程来恢复必要的平衡。查看全文下载全文关键字HIV / AIDS,性与生殖健康与权利,预防,医疗,发展相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2010.539594

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号