首页> 外文期刊>Critical Criminology >Shadow values, shadow figures: real violence
【24h】

Shadow values, shadow figures: real violence

机译:影子价值观,影子人物:真正的暴力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

How can violence be both a public anathema and a private common place? In order to explore this question, data from the North London Domestic Violence Survey are revisited and the reasons why men justify violence against women investigated. This is related to Sykes and Matza’s dual notions of the techniques of neutralization and subterranean values indicating the potential of this work in understanding domestic violence. Further, this paper confronts recent arguments that estimates relating to the extent and distribution of domestic violence are either too unreliable due to problems of response and differences in defining ‘violence’ or that those figures produced by feminist research arise from a massaging of the data and, as such, exaggerate the risk.
机译:暴力如何既是公众的厌恶又是私人的共同场所?为了探讨这个问题,我们重新审查了北伦敦家庭暴力调查的数据,并调查了男人为暴力侵害妇女辩护的理由。这与赛克斯(Sykes)和马特扎(Matza)对中和技术和地下价值的双重观念有关,这些观念表明这项工作在理解家庭暴力方面的潜力。此外,本文还面临着最近的论点,即有关家庭暴力的程度和分布的估计要么由于回应问题和在定义“暴力”方面的差异而过于不可靠,要么是由女权主义研究产生的那些数据来自对数据和数据的汇总。因此,夸大了风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号