首页> 外文期刊>Criminal Law and Philosophy >Fair Play, Political Obligation, and Punishment
【24h】

Fair Play, Political Obligation, and Punishment

机译:公平竞争,政治义务和惩罚

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper attempts to establish that, and explain why, the practice of punishing offenders is in principle morally permissible. My account is a nonstandard version of the fair play view, according to which punishment’s permissibility derives from reciprocal obligations shared by members of a political community, understood as a mutually beneficial, cooperative venture. Most fair play views portray punishment as an appropriate means of removing the unfair advantage an offender gains relative to law-abiding members of the community. Such views struggle, however, to provide a plausible account of this unfairly gained benefit. By contrast, on my account punishment’s permissibility follows more straightforwardly from the fair play view of political obligation: specifically, the rule instituting punishment is itself among those rules with which members of the political community are obliged to comply. For criminal offenders, compliance requires submitting to the prospect of punishment.
机译:本文试图证明这一点,并解释为什么在原则上在道德上允许惩罚罪犯的做法。我的说法是公平竞争观点的非标准版本,根据该观点,惩罚的可允许性来自政治共同体成员共同承担的对等义务,这被理解为互惠互利的合作企业。大多数公平竞争者将惩罚描述为一种消除犯罪者相对于社区守法成员所获得的不公平利益的适当手段。但是,这种观点很难为这种不公平获得的利益提供合理的解释。相比之下,就我个人而言,从政治义务的公平竞争角度来看,惩罚的可容许性更为直接:具体来说,制定惩罚的规则本身就是政治社会成员必须遵守的规则之一。对于刑事罪犯,合规性要求服从惩罚的可能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号