首页> 外文期刊>International journal of constitutional law >Is there a case-legally and politically -for direct effect of WTO obligations? (Abstract only)
【24h】

Is there a case-legally and politically -for direct effect of WTO obligations? (Abstract only)

机译:WTO义务的直接效力在法律上和政治上是否存在? (仅限摘要)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

WTO law does not require its direct effect in domestic legal orders. Whilst the stances taken in these are diverse, showing that direct effect is not denied on the whole to WTO law, all the major trading members of the WTO deny it. The fact that, in a case where a WTO member does not comply and is targeted by trade sanctions, the economic actors who in practice bear the burden of these sanctions are deprived of any recourse, may be considered unfair enough to question again the denial of direct effect. The analysis focuses notably on the EU where the debate has expanded more than anywhere else and concludes that direct effect should, even in the name of fairness or justice, be handled with caution.
机译:WTO法律并不要求其直接影响国内法律秩序。尽管其中采取的立场是多种多样的,表明在总体上并未否认对WTO法律的直接影响,但WTO的所有主要贸易成员都否认这一点。在世贸组织成员不遵守贸易制裁并受到贸易制裁作为目标的情况下,实际上承担这些制裁负担的经济行为者被剥夺了任何追索权的事实,可能被认为是不公平的,足以再次质疑否认制裁的行为。直接效果。分析主要集中在欧盟,辩论的范围比其他任何地方都扩大,并得出结论认为,即使是出于公平或正义的名义,也应谨慎处理直接影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号