首页> 外文期刊>Creativity Research Journal >Scientific Geniuses' Psychopathology as a Moderator in the Relation Between Creative Contribution Types and Eminence
【24h】

Scientific Geniuses' Psychopathology as a Moderator in the Relation Between Creative Contribution Types and Eminence

机译:科学天才的精神病理学作为主持人在创新贡献类型与卓越之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The present study investigated whether scientific geniuses' psychopathology might exert significant influences on their scientific eminence by its interaction with their creative contribution types (paradigm-preserving contributions or paradigm-rejecting contributions). A systematic review of literature on psychopathology of geniuses was conducted using PsycINFO (1967-2005). Seventy-six scientific geniuses were chosen and divided into 4 groups: No Psychopathology Group (n = 22), Personality Disorders Group (n = 27), Mood Disorders Group (n = 13), and Schizophrenia Group (n = 14). The results suggested that psychopathology of geniuses might play the role of a moderator in the relation between creative contribution types and scientific eminence. Implications regarding the mad-genius debate were discussed.
机译:本研究调查了科学天才的心理病理学是否可能通过其与创新贡献类型(保留范式的贡献或拒绝范式的贡献)的相互作用而对其科学显着性产生重大影响。使用PsycINFO(1967-2005)对天才的精神病理学文献进行了系统的综述。选择了76名科学天才,将其分为4组:无精神病理学组(n = 22),人格障碍组(n = 27),情绪障碍组(n = 13)和精神分裂症组(n = 14)。结果表明,天才的心理病理学可能在创造性贡献类型与科学卓越之间的关系中扮演主持人的角色。讨论了有关疯狂天才辩论的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号