首页> 外文期刊>Corporate Governance >How Should National Governing Bodies of Sport Be Governed in the UK? An Exploratory Study of Board Structure
【24h】

How Should National Governing Bodies of Sport Be Governed in the UK? An Exploratory Study of Board Structure

机译:英国的国家体育领导机构应如何管理?董事会结构探索性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Manuscript Type: EmpiricalrnResearch Question/Issue: This study explores the most appropriate board structure for national governing bodies (NGBs) of sport in the UK. Sports are a very important aspect of UK society, involving a significant number of participants and spectators, occupying a key role in furthering the nation's health, and, at the elite level, a source of considerable national pride. From a governance perspective, NGBs of sport are non-profit organizations, managing both professional and amateur sports, and administering the allocation of considerable amounts of funds, especially public funds. The study was motivated by a renewed interest, not least from government, in ensuring NGBs had an appropriate structure to ensure optimal decision-making for their stakeholders.rnResearch Findings/Insights: We interviewed 22 senior administrators involved in sports in the UK. Our interviews sought to ascertain their views on the appropriateness of applying a number of key board reforms, currently seen as good practice, to NGBs of sport. The overall consensus is as follows: (1) NGBs should reform the composition of their boards to better reflect business demands; (2) board size should be in the range of five to 12 members; (3) NGBs should have different individuals occupying the positions of CEO and chairman; and (4) boards of NGBs should possess more non-executive directors.rnTheoretical/Academic Implications: This research adds to our understanding of governance in non-profit organizations generally and NGBs of sport in particular. Ascertaining the views of key administrators and advisors in sport provides a novel contribution to the governance in sport literature. Our findings allow us to develop a number of propositions capable of being examined further in subsequent research.rnPractitioner/Policy Implications: The results of this study feed into an important on-going debate regarding the appropriate governance structure of sport NGBs in the UK. A key finding is that boards in NGBs should move away from being only representative, but should also include members with specific business expertise as well as a greater element of nonexecutive monitoring.
机译:原稿类型:经验研究问题/问题:本研究探讨了英国国家体育理事机构(NGB)的最合适的董事会结构。体育是英国社会的一个非常重要的方面,有大量的参与者和观众参与其中,在促进国家健康方面发挥着关键作用,并且在精英阶层,体育是举世瞩目的民族自豪感。从治理的角度来看,体育的NGB是非营利组织,管理职业和业余体育,并管理大量资金(尤其是公共资金)的分配。这项研究的动机是重新产生兴趣,尤其是来自政府的兴趣,以确保NGB具有适当的结构以确保其利益相关者的最佳决策。研究结果/见解:我们采访了英国22位从事体育运动的高级管理人员。我们的访谈试图确定他们对将大量关键董事会改革(目前被视为良好做法)应用于体育非政府组织的适当性的观点。总体共识如下:(1)NGB应该改革其董事会的组成,以更好地反映业务需求; (2)董事会人数应在5至12名成员之间; (3)NGB应由不同的个人担任首席执行官和董事长一职; (4)NGB董事会应拥有更多的非执行董事。理论/学术意义:这项研究使我们对非营利组织,尤其是体育NGB的治理有了更多的了解。确定体育运动中主要管理者和顾问的观点为体育文学的治理提供了新的贡献。我们的发现使我们能够提出一些主张,可以在随后的研究中进行进一步的研究。实践者/政策含义:这项研究的结果引起了有关英国运动NGB的适当治理结构的持续辩论。一个关键的发现是,NGB中的董事会应该摆脱仅代表的角色,而应该包括具有特定业务专长以及更大程度的非执行监控要素的成员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号