...
首页> 外文期刊>Corporate Governance >Tax Enforcement as a Corporate Governance Mechanism: Empirical Evidence from China
【24h】

Tax Enforcement as a Corporate Governance Mechanism: Empirical Evidence from China

机译:税收执法作为公司治理机制:来自中国的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Manuscript Type: Empirical Research Question/Issue: This study first measures tax enforcement efforts for 35 tax regions within China, then analyzes the role of tax enforcement as a corporate governance mechanism by examining whether regional tax enforcement efforts reduce two types of agency costs in Chinese listed firms. Research Findings/Insights: Using archival data from a pooled sample of 917 listed firms with total 3,668 observations from 2003 to 2006 in China, we find the following results: (1) regional tax enforcement efforts reduce corporate agency costs between shareholders and managers and agency costs between blockholders and minority shareholders; (2) by reducing two kinds of agency costs, tax enforcement efforts improve a firm's market performance; and (3) the governance role of tax enforcement efforts is more significant for state-controlled firms than for entrepreneur-controlled firms. Theoretical/Academic Implications: This study suggests that tax enforcement can act as a corporate governance mechanism. Tax authorities not only have the ability to increase national tax revenue, but also play a positive role in decreasing agency costs, including agency costs between shareholders and managers and those between block shareholders and minority shareholders. Practitioner/Policy Implications: This study offers a new insight to policy makers interested in transforming economies that corporate governance build-up should be multidimensional. Besides the traditionally internal governance mechanisms represented by boards of directors and external governance mechanisms represented by takeover markets, tax enforcement is also an important corporate governance mechanism. The enforcement power of tax authorities could be better utilized to supervise firm operations in emerging markets.
机译:论文类型:实证研究问题/研究:本研究首先评估中国35个税区的税收执法工作,然后通过检查区域税收执法工作是否减少了两种中文代理成本来分析税收执法作为公司治理机制的作用。上市公司。研究结果/见解:利用2003年至2006年间来自917家上市公司的汇总样本的存档数据,共获得3,668项观察结果,我们得出以下结果:(1)区域税收执法工作减少了股东,经理和代理之间的公司代理成本。大股东与少数股东之间的成本; (2)通过减少两种代理成本,税收执法工作可以提高企业的市场绩效; (3)对于国有控股公司而言,税收执法工作的治理作用要比对企业家控股公司更重要。理论/学术含义:这项研究表明,税收执法可以充当公司治理机制。税务机关不仅具有增加国家税收的能力,而且在降低代理成本方面也发挥着积极作用,包括股东与管理者之间以及大股东与少数股东之间的代理成本。从业者/政策含义:这项研究为有兴趣转变经济的决策者提供了新的见解,即公司治理的建立应是多维的。除了传统上以董事会为代表的内部治理机制和以接管市场为代表的外部治理机制外,税收执法也是重要的公司治理机制。可以更好地利用税务机关的执法权来监督新兴市场中的公司运营。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Corporate Governance》 |2011年第1期|p.25-40|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Economic and Business Administration Department at Framingham State University,USA;

    School of Business, Nankai University, China;

    School of Accountancy, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    corporate governance; tax enforcement; China;

    机译:公司治理;税收执法;中国;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号