首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary Buddhism: An Interdisciplinary Journal >Mindfulness and the myth of mental illness: implications for theory and practice
【24h】

Mindfulness and the myth of mental illness: implications for theory and practice

机译:正念与精神疾病的神话:对理论与实践的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the past 60 years Thomas Szasz (1960, 1961[1974], 2008) has forcefully argued that mental illnesses are mythical since all medical diseases are located in the body and, thus, have somatic causes. This has been accompanied by a scathing and coruscating critique of the whole mental health professiona??particularly, those psychologists, psychiatrists and psychotherapists who collude in and exploit the alleged mythology of counterfeit mental disorders and often (unwittingly or deliberately) justify coercion, oppression and pharmacological manipulation of so-called a??mental patientsa?? in the name of a??treatmentsa??. Since mindfulness practitionersa??perhaps especially teachers of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction and related programmesa??may, by association, be partially implicated in Szasz's allegations, this article seeks to explore and examine the implications for theory and practice in the field. It will be suggested that the strong foundational, theoretical, research and teaching bases of mindfulness-based interventions offer practitioners a solid defence against the general critique offered by Szasz, and more specific challenges advanced by critics such as Boysen (2007) and Whitaker (2010). However, there may still be potential pitfalls for those mindfulness-based interventions which are too closely allied to the psychiatric/pscychotheraputic establishment, and some suggestions for avoiding such obstacles will be offered through recommendations for maintaining connections between mindfulness and its Buddhist origins.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2012.716705
机译:在过去的60年中,Thomas Szasz(1960,1961 [1974],2008)有力地认为精神疾病是神话,因为所有医学疾病都位于体内,因此具有躯体性原因。随之而来的是对整个精神卫生专业的严厉批评,尤其是那些在所谓的假冒精神障碍神话中进行勾结并加以利用的心理学家,精神病医生和心理治疗师,并且经常(无意或有意地)证明胁迫,压迫和压制是正当的。所谓的“精神病人”的药理处理以“治疗”的名义。由于正念练习者(也许尤其是基于正念的认知疗法的老师,基于正念的压力减轻和相关计划)可能会部分地牵涉到Szasz的指控中,因此本文力求探索和研究对理论和实践的启示在该领域。建议基于正念干预的强大的基础,理论,研究和教学基础为从业人员提供坚实的防御,以抵御Szasz提出的一般性批评,以及批评家如Boysen(2007)和Whitaker(2010)提出的更具体的挑战)。但是,对于那些与精神病学/心理治疗机构过于紧密相关的基于正念的干预措施可能仍然存在潜在的陷阱,并且将通过保持正念与佛教起源之间的联系的建议来提供一些避免此类障碍的建议。全文下载相关文章,请参见var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布日期:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”} ; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”:true,“ ui_click”:true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2012.716705

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号