首页> 外文期刊>Consulting-specifying engineer >Specifying Ends and Means
【24h】

Specifying Ends and Means

机译:指定终点和均值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The term performance-based is commonly used to describe codes and standards that seek to define the purpose and scope of a building system, without specifically prescribing its details. Performance-based specifying pushes the concept a step further, using it to describe the nature of the actual specification that an engineer writes. "The difference between [performance-based] codes and specifying is that codes refer to the regulatory part," says Jon Traw, P.E, president of the International Conference of Building Officials. "Specifying is outside the regulatory. It's an owner-builder-supplier relationship." In fact, a project design could, for example, rely on performance-based design without using performance specifications. "You could have a project with performance-based design, but just standard prescriptive specs," explains Dan Gemeny, P.E., a vice president at The RJA Group's Los Angeles office. "We tend to write performance specs for fire systems. But in the fire alarm industry, it's not atypical for system vendors to go to the engineering house and sell their equipment. In fact, it's typically a proprietary spec," says the consultant.
机译:基于性能的术语通常用于描述旨在定义建筑系统的目的和范围的代码和标准,而无需特别说明其详细信息。基于性能的指定将概念进一步推进,用它来描述工程师编写的实际规范的性质。 “(基于性能)规范与规范之间的区别在于,规范涉及法规部分,”国际建筑官员会议主席P.E乔恩·特劳(Jon Traw)说。 “规范不在监管范围之内。这是所有者-建造者-供应商的关系。”实际上,例如,项目设计可以不使用性能规格就依赖基于性能的设计。 RJA Group洛杉矶办事处副总裁Dan Gemeny,P.E.解释说:“您可以有一个基于性能的设计的项目,而只是标准的规范性规范。”顾问说:“我们倾向于编写消防系统的性能规格。但是,在火灾报警行业中,系统供应商去工程师馆出售他们的设备并不是非典型的。实际上,这通常是专有规格。”

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号