首页> 外文期刊>Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science, and Technology >Enumerating Language: 'The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics'
【24h】

Enumerating Language: 'The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics'

机译:枚举语言:“数学的不合理有效性”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A written symbol long recognized as operating non-alphabetically—even by those deeply and quite unconsciously committed to alphabeticism—is that of number. . . . But, despite this recognition, there has been no sustained attention to mathematical writing even remotely matching the enormous outpouring of analysis, philosophizing, and deconstructive opening up of what those in the humanities have come simply to call "texts." Why, one might ask, should this be so? Why should the sign system long acknowledged as the paradigm of abstract rational thought and the without-which-nothing of Western technoscience have been so unexamined, let alone analyzed, theorized, or deconstructed, as a mode of writing?
机译:长期以来一直被认为非字母操作的书面符号(即使是那些深深而又不自觉地致力于字母主义的人)也是数字。 。 。 。但是,尽管有了这种认识,但对数学写作却没有持续的关注,甚至远不及分析,哲学化和解构性的大量涌现,而人文科学界将它们简单地称为“文本”。有人可能会问,为什么会这样呢?为什么符号系统长期以来一直被认为是抽象的理性思想的范式,而西方技术科学的无所作为却没有被如此研究,更不用说对其进行分析,理论化或解构了,作为一种书写方式?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号