首页> 外文期刊>Computers & operations research >Comparison of Condorcet and Weber solutions on a plane: Social choice versus centralization
【24h】

Comparison of Condorcet and Weber solutions on a plane: Social choice versus centralization

机译:在飞机上比较Condorcet和Weber解决方案:社会选择与集中化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper compares the quality of facility location resulting from voting and that of a centralized decision. The focus is on the quality of the Condorcet solution, which is measured by the ratio of the Condorcet solution value to the global Weber solution value. Prior work defined on networks showed that the ratio is bounded by 3. We attempt to reduce the impact of topology by investigating the problem on the plane. In this case, the ratio is smaller than root 2. The result suggests that, when reducing the impact of topology, although a solution originated via voting can be somewhat distant from the optimal solution obtained via a centralized system, it is much closer to optimality than previously suggested. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文比较了投票和集中决策所产生的设施选址质量。重点放在Condorcet解决方案的质量上,该质量由Condorcet解决方案值与全局Weber解决方案值之比来衡量。在网络上定义的先前工作表明,该比率受3限制。我们尝试通过调查平面上的问题来减少拓扑的影响。在这种情况下,该比率小于根2。结果表明,当减少拓扑的影响时,尽管通过投票产生的解决方案可能与通过集中式系统获得的最优解决方案有些距离,但它更接近于最优性。比以前建议的要多。 (C)2013 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号