...
首页> 外文期刊>Computers, IEEE Transactions on >DRAM Refresh Mechanisms, Penalties, and Trade-Offs
【24h】

DRAM Refresh Mechanisms, Penalties, and Trade-Offs

机译:DRAM刷新机制,惩罚和权衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Ever-growing application data footprints demand faster main memory with larger capacity. DRAM has been the technology choice for main memory due to its low latency and high density. However, DRAM cells must be refreshed periodically to preserve their content. Refresh operations negatively affect performance and power. Traditionally, the performance and power overhead of refresh have been insignificant. But as the size and speed of DRAM chips continue to increase, refresh becomes a dominating factor of DRAM performance and power dissipation. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive study of the issues related to refresh operations in modern DRAMs. Specifically, we describe the difference in refresh operations between modern synchronous DRAM and traditional asynchronous DRAM; the refresh modes and timings; and variations in data retention time. Moreover, we quantify refresh penalties versus device speed, size, and total memory capacity. We also categorize refresh mechanisms based on command granularity, and summarize refresh techniques proposed in research papers. Finally, based on our experiments and observations, we propose guidelines for mitigating DRAM refresh penalties.
机译:不断增长的应用程序数据占用空间要求更快的主内存和更大的容量。由于DRAM的低延迟和高密度,它已成为主存储器的技术选择。但是,必须定期刷新DRAM单元以保留其内容。刷新操作会对性能和功耗产生负面影响。传统上,刷新的性能和功耗开销微不足道。但是随着DRAM芯片尺寸和速度的不断提高,刷新成为DRAM性能和功耗的主要因素。在本文中,我们对与现代DRAM中的刷新操作有关的问题进行了全面研究。具体来说,我们描述了现代同步DRAM与传统异步DRAM在刷新操作上的差异。刷新模式和时序;以及数据保留时间的变化。此外,我们量化了刷新惩罚与设备速度,大小和总存储容量之间的关系。我们还基于命令粒度对刷新机制进行了分类,并总结了研究论文中提出的刷新技术。最后,根据我们的实验和观察,我们提出了减轻DRAM刷新损失的准则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号